voted m3 for me.
What about one of those turbo audi's? The earlier 2000's models you can find easily for under 20k.
What about one of those turbo audi's? The earlier 2000's models you can find easily for under 20k.
OneJoeZee said:If you choose mini, civic, prelude, or mr2 spyder, you will officially be gay.
Lies, on that car, the 1zz is plenty. Well not plenty but w/e hehe.HellsLegion said:1zz = no guts. Needs more 2zz
That and the fact they are pigs. honestly i do not see good gas mileage with one of those. or insurance.91T breezen' said:M3, or S2000 here also. Be prepared for a maintenance headache with the M3 though!:icon_razz
skim1040 said:What about one of those turbo audi's? The earlier 2000's models you can find easily for under 20k.
HellsLegion said:1zz = no guts. Needs more 2zz
HellsLegion said:I vote M3, cause thats a sports car, your looking for fuel economy, so number 1 and 2 does good for that.
Be aware, the MR-2 Spyder's has a 1zz-fe. POS motor, Get a cheap one, and swap a 2zz-ge from a celica GT-s and call it a day.
celica came with 2 motors, the 1zz and the 2zz. the 1zz made i think it was 130 ish hp and 110ish torqu while the celicamade 180 and 120? i dotn remeber exact numbers but what i will say is that the 1zz was a far better platform to turbo. it also has torque lower on the powerband.Ckanderson said:will someone link me to the difference between the celica motor and mr2?
better than the m3 with the plastic waterpump impellar, drivetrain donuts that go bad, weak rear shock bushings that always break, I could go on and on.bigaaron said:sc300 with a 1jz!
mattjk said:better than the m3 with the plastic waterpump impellar, drivetrain donuts that go bad, weak rear shock bushings that always break, I could go on and on.