Rosie attacks the second amendment

[Shytheed Dumas]

but would it not be a good start?

No, I don't think so. What good is it to put a bandaid on a tumor? It might look good, but doesn't do a thing. I think a good start is in looking at how kids are raised today. I am doing my absolute damnest to instill the values in my children that will keep them from ever wanting to harm people. They can own 100 guns for all I care. So then you might say that not all children are as lucky. That's true, but there are groups out there that take care of children most at risk and try to raise them in a loving way and instill those things the best they can. I think support through volunteer time and money are far more productive starts than gun bans.

 

[jimi87-t]

My point is, it is not going to do a thing for keeping guns out of the hands of criminals by putting any regulations on guns, you think they will some how follow these regs. All that will do is leave law abiding people with less means of self-defence.

 

[Mr.PFloyd]

My point is, it is not going to do a thing for keeping guns out of the hands of criminals by putting any regulations on guns, you think they will some how follow these regs. All that will do is leave law abiding people with less means of self-defence.

thats another problem i see with peoples reactiosn to takign away guns "less means of self-defense".
I usually live alone with my brother for monthsw on end and we never and i eman neevr worry about self defense. thats what taking Ju-Hitsu is for and working out regularly.

 

[jimi87-t]

Have fun with that if anyone pulls a gun on you from 10 paces out, or you come home one day and a dude has your wife and kids at gun point
BTW I also train in 3 different forms of martial arts. (Isshinryu, Ju-Hitsu, and a form of ground fighting)

 

[Mr.PFloyd]

Have fun with that if anyone pulls a gun on you from 10 paces out, or you come home one day and a dude has your wife and kids at gun point
BTW I also train in 3 different forms of martial arts.

hmm, its funny really cause i have neevr thought about bein in danger like that. And im 18 so i dotn think i have to worry about my wife beign held at gunpouitn anytime soon :biglaugh:
do you? which forms? I was gonan post in the gun thread aboput how i could probably disarm evrone of them at close range :biglaugh:

 

[jimi87-t]

do you? which forms? I was gonan post in the gun thread aboput how i could probably disarm evrone of them at close range :biglaugh:

(I edited my post to include the forms) I have no doubt that you could. Hopefully you are never in that type of situation, and if you are hopefully the person decides to come in close.

 

[Mr.PFloyd]

(I edited my post to include the forms) I have no doubt that you could. Hopefully you are never in that type of situation, and if you are hopefully the person decides to come in close.

i demand a battle from you now! Well get hellslegion in on this too cause he seems to be JDM as of late.

 

[Big Wang Bandit]

 

[pedro]

only to add my 2 cents, Gun control is a load of crap, we just have to look at history. the first thing that any goverent does before trying to make a dictatorship is to get rid of weapons and lie to its people to tell them its to get it out of the criminals hands.

Then then say we are this way and thats final, those who oppose die, and those that don't suffer. YAY!

Another point, how many of the legal guns have killed people vs those that enter the U.S legally? =)

How do you plan to crontrol the illegal guns when they are already illegal?

As stated above criminals don't follow laws.

Personally i dont own a gun, i do have plenty of swords, which i collect. I want to start to collect guns, but the fact that i live in Inglewood, and its a known fact that you are more likely to get killed by your own gun than use it in defence I havn't started my collection yet.

 

[jimi87-t]

i demand a battle from you now! Well get hellslegion in on this too cause he seems to be JDM as of late.

:biglaugh: Haha, but no I don't think EVERYone should be running around with guns. My only point is that when you start regulating stuff, it only regulates the law abiding people, and this will just give criminals that much more leeway on society. Thats the way I see it.

 

[TurboWarrior]

dictatorship? guns are illegal in many countries that aren't a dictatorship

 

[bluepearl]

Her and her wife.[/QUOTE]
You mean him and his wife

 

[Nick M]

There are thousands of "gun control" laws on the books already. They do not effect crime in any way. Crime was not invented after the musket came out.

Which state has a worse violent crime rate? Idaho or New York? Idaho has almost no gun control, New York has everything. Not total crimes, because the population difference will skew the results, but which state has the higher rate?

 

[SupraDerk]

I don't own any guns, I might eventually, but if you look at the reason our founding fathers put it in the constitution, then you'll appreciate it. But it would seem that many in our society today can't really tell you what's IN the constitution and probably couldn't tell you what rights they HAVE due to the constitution.

So why is it that everyone is trying to take away our means of protecting ourselves against a strong central government *that wasn't meant to be as "big" as they are now*? People will realize what's going on when it's too late

 

[trydrew]

Discuss

 

[cwapface]

If school teachers and principals were armed then school shootings wouldn't happen.

That's the only part of the OP that I have a problem with, it's baseless and stupid, much like Rosie O'Donnell

 

[drunk_medic]

Rosie has always been anti-gun. Back in '99 she said something about if you do own a gun, she thinks you should go to prison.

I don't understand how you can have a bodyguard for yourself or child and NOT have them strapped, but apparently they don't carry. Blessed are the meek, not because they shall inherit the earth, but because they make easy targets.

 

[Toyota h8r]

I hate that fat bitch.

OMG! :Bows down: DT you are my idol! School officals with weapons sounds like a plan. By the way im a proud NRA member and i hunt, so all gun hating jerkoffs.....screw off!

 

[csr ma71]

If kids are allowed to bring guns to school, then no kid would go on a shooting rampage because other kids will stop him before the teachers do.

 

[thedave925]

Fresh from her assault on Christianity, Rosie Odonnell chimes in on the murder of innocent children by some psychopath by blaming guns.

“I think the horror of imagining six to thirteen-year-old girls handcuffed together and shot execution style, one by one, is perhaps enough to awaken the nation that maybe we need some stricter gun control laws.” and furthermore “In the United States there is debate over whether or not the right to bear arms includes the lobby organization of the NRA, allowing no rules and no registration and absolutely, sort of, carte blanche, to make guns available to Americans in a way they’re not in the rest of the world.” -Rosie O'Donnell

I don't know if she really believes this shit or if she is just an idiot parrot for the Libs. If school teachers and principals were armed then school shootings wouldn't happen. The "gun free zones" around schools that the libs instituted make it far less risky for psychos who want to kill kids. They know that they will be the only ones armed .

If a neighbor knew what was happening and was coincidentaly armed, what would have happened?
Execution style murders? Thats some sick stuff. Why does it happen? Maybe it comes from a demented rationality, which could develop over time through heavy experiences or stresses. And how does an individual get exposed to such situations? Follow my train of thought? Disturbing...

Lets focus on the timeless issue at hand.
If we lost the second amendment, or rather, the power it grants the common people, we would then become sheep without the power to restore freedom as it was first meant to be. We could then easily fall under a dictatorship or tyrancy. Not good. The forefathers wanted to make sure that we could maintain our freedom. I'm sure that if they knew that other forms of defence would be invented and evolve, then the second amendment would have been written to include "freedom-ensuring weapons".

Because Rosie O'Donnel enjoys her first amendment rights, it seems that she should support the second amendment because they are distantly related.

The Rosie thought:
Rosie is speaking out. She is getting attention. Nationally. She wants to be popular. That leads to airtime. Airtime=money. Money=food. She must be running out :icon_surp

Any other thoughts? I have more to share lol

-Dave