quick supra vs 3000?
- Thread starter mk3_89turbo
- Start date
- Status
3000gt? Those things are massively heavy, even heavier than our cars I think.
Which model? Base/SL or VR-4?
Which model? Base/SL or VR-4?
What I meant was that theyre heavy in general and can be as heavy, if not, more than the Supra, a lot of it depending on the model.
http://www.team3s.com/FAQ-Specs1.htm
http://www.team3s.com/FAQ-Specs1.htm
The base model 3000gt in the u.s. was the dodge stealth it was a 12v v6 making 160hp and 184ft-lb
The next was SL 3000gt making decent power. The greatest power stock it ever was made at was 221hp and 204ft-lb
The vr4 were pretty much beasts from the factory
Six-speed, twin turbo, making 321hp at 5500rpm and 315ft-lb at only 2500rpm.
Not much boost lag there it seems.
and at 3100lbs to 3800lbs stock not overly heavy. Still a piggy though.
for a 3.0l doesn't do to bad
base model SL runs 16.4 quarter mile
vr4 stock runs mid 13's to low 14's depends on year.
A quicker supra could take him but he would have to have some nice modifications just to take a stock 3000gt vr4 i would imagine.
The next was SL 3000gt making decent power. The greatest power stock it ever was made at was 221hp and 204ft-lb
The vr4 were pretty much beasts from the factory
Six-speed, twin turbo, making 321hp at 5500rpm and 315ft-lb at only 2500rpm.
Not much boost lag there it seems.
and at 3100lbs to 3800lbs stock not overly heavy. Still a piggy though.
for a 3.0l doesn't do to bad
base model SL runs 16.4 quarter mile
vr4 stock runs mid 13's to low 14's depends on year.
A quicker supra could take him but he would have to have some nice modifications just to take a stock 3000gt vr4 i would imagine.
Yup, i love all the "generations" except the 96 97 or so front end.
love that they decided to drop that big ass wing on the vr-4s late in the later 90s.
love that they decided to drop that big ass wing on the vr-4s late in the later 90s.
stealths came with 12v engines, 3000gt's came with 24's, in NAs I believe..
the R/T, VR-4's were the TT ones that hauled major ass..
the 1st gens had 5 speeds as my friend has one, and the later models were 6 speed...
they're very fast, and not too shabby, defintely quicker stock than a MKIII turbo..
the R/T, VR-4's were the TT ones that hauled major ass..
the 1st gens had 5 speeds as my friend has one, and the later models were 6 speed...
they're very fast, and not too shabby, defintely quicker stock than a MKIII turbo..
tbcmorris;1335929 said:
:word8kn: lol!
but anyway. i'll vouche for the quickness even on the sl's compared to our n/a's. ive gotten spanked by my friend's sl. it was a virually stock, while i have cai with a 2.5 free slowing exhaust. id say about a car and a half. i will say, they are fun to drive. still perfer my supra though.
- Status