adampecush;1305565 said:I suggest you do some in-depth reading and understand what fatigue actually is. It is not the degradation of the mechanical properties of a material. It is the initiation and propagation of cracking due to the application of cyclic stress. In the case of steel, this stress has to be greater than a threshold stress (aka the fatigue limit), otherwise, cracking will not occur. Guess what, vehicle bodies are designed with this fact in mind.
If your vehicle body has been weakened by fatigue to the point that it is noticable, catastrophic failure is iminent. I have yet to see fatigue cracking destroy the body of a supra, but hey, never say never. The rear subframe is a different story.
Better yet, ask a metallurgist (ahem). When you bend your paper clip, you strain harden it, reducing its ductility. Continued bending reduces its ductililty to the point where it can no longer bend and remain intact, so it breaks. Some call this low cycle fatigue, but it is not.
Apparently you do.
no thanks.
Ok I have my hands up already. I know I am out numbered. Here is the last thing I have to say. I know body cars are designed for that but constant bending and flexing of abusing your car without proper support it will still weaken. ANY THING THATS IS ABUSED WEAKENS SPECIALLY WHEN CONSIDERING THE AGE OF THE MATERIAL. I could not say anything anymore your a metallurgical engineer. Im just a mechanical engineer getting my masters. Thats ur major so I could not argue with that. Me, as a manufacturing engineer, I still respect the wokrer ideas and comments because they are the one that sees the problems that engineers does not expect to see.
ok thats it for me
Last edited: