Pre 89 Wing? Wingless? or Whaletail?

Wingless? Pre 89? Whale tail?

  • Wingless

    Votes: 61 32.8%
  • Pre 89

    Votes: 37 19.9%
  • Whale Tail

    Votes: 49 26.3%
  • Other, specify

    Votes: 39 21.0%

  • Total voters
    186

Suprapowaz!(2)

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
2,870
0
0
50
San Antonio, Tx.
Wingless is a clean look. It goes good with your rear visor. If you go with any kind of wing I'd think you'd have to lose your rear visor. Otherwise it would look a little cluttered back there.
 

Moy

It's broken...
Aug 6, 2008
2,432
0
36
Beach Park, IL
Suprapowaz!(2);1391051 said:
Wingless is a clean look. It goes good with your rear visor. If you go with any kind of wing I'd think you'd have to lose your rear visor. Otherwise it would look a little cluttered back there.

Well, yes and no. I personally thing the sun shade would look good with a GT style wing (like the one featured on the S2 Supra)

p1391062_1.jpg



The shade looks pretty good on MK3, too (Regulus kit)

p1391062_2.jpg



It would be less cluttered with a pre-89 spoiler, as apposed to the 89+ 3pc, as the 3pc sits a little bit higher. Use an 88 spoiler with the aero-friendly tail light :D
 

mkIIIman089

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
3,061
0
36
Ohio
IMO it's really close between whale tail and the 89+ stock wing. Since your option is whale tail - I'd go with that. I think it looks more like it belongs if you have one or two other minor body tweaks as well.
 

tsuper92

supra addict
Apr 7, 2005
1,376
0
0
54
mass
i had NO intention's on changing my 89+ 3pc wing.i ended up getting bomex side's and rear's for my car.once i got those piece's installed it did look good with the stock wing.
after showing a friend the car,we tried his whale tail on the car.it just made the car look complete,but i probably wouldn't have done the whale tail otherwise.

my vote is for 89+ on the car the way it sit's,but would change the tail's in the future also.