OfnaRcR4;1700272 said:Kay? Btw 89+ I'd when the front changed. Rear taillights on the pre 89's look a little odd to me.
Koenigturbo;1700889 said:I have a 90 car with a pre 89 bumper, so I agree. I'm selling both style bumpers and I get more inquiries about the 89+ bumper than the pre 89 bumper and they go for more money.
The pre 89 is sits higher? You guys mean it shorter from top to bottom? I never noticed.
Devin LeBlanc;1700806 said:I love the pre 89 front, the straight bumper and bigger fog lights look so much better with the car, 89 tails however look the best!I think its been said about 12 times haha
aloshan;1701469 said:its seems like weve all come to an agreement , the pre 89 front is way better but the 89+tail is better looking..... now to get the best of both worlds....
Van;1700292 said:IMHO, both stock versions of the MkIII Supra look better than the stock MkIV. To me, the MkIV is a large jelly bean; it's too round!
I do want my MkIII as light as the stock MkIV hartop, and I hope to get the weight down to 3200Lbs.
aloshan;1701469 said:its seems the majority has come to an agreement , the pre 89 front is way better but the 89+tail is better looking..... now to get the best of both worlds....