OfnaRcR4;1700272 said:Kay? Btw 89+ I'd when the front changed. Rear taillights on the pre 89's look a little odd to me.
Koenigturbo;1700889 said:I have a 90 car with a pre 89 bumper, so I agree. I'm selling both style bumpers and I get more inquiries about the 89+ bumper than the pre 89 bumper and they go for more money.
The pre 89 is sits higher? You guys mean it shorter from top to bottom? I never noticed.
Devin LeBlanc;1700806 said:I love the pre 89 front, the straight bumper and bigger fog lights look so much better with the car, 89 tails however look the best! I think its been said about 12 times haha
aloshan;1701469 said:its seems like weve all come to an agreement , the pre 89 front is way better but the 89+tail is better looking..... now to get the best of both worlds....
Van;1700292 said:IMHO, both stock versions of the MkIII Supra look better than the stock MkIV. To me, the MkIV is a large jelly bean; it's too round!
I do want my MkIII as light as the stock MkIV hartop, and I hope to get the weight down to 3200Lbs.
aloshan;1701469 said:its seems the majority has come to an agreement , the pre 89 front is way better but the 89+tail is better looking..... now to get the best of both worlds....