pics of stock vs. 57 trim ct26

[GrimJack]

FYI, that's an 89 on the left, (the original turbo off my car, as a matter of fact) and something else on the right.

 

[ImpulseDrive]

Thanks for the pics guys. I will definitely get this from drift motion after I get my engine rebuilt. I don't want anything too crazy and my power goals are 350-400hp, this turbo would help me obtain that right?

 

[Rennat]

Yeah, how about the pictures you just looked at. :nono: Or was the TSB and commercial publications...

uh... i dont see how looking at a picture of the compressor housings and the two wastegates tell you that they redesigned the wastegate for faster spool...

i'll go look at the 88 vs 90 OEM specs for HP and TQ to see if there different...

 

[GrimJack]

The specs are different, but not by much. The difference is the location of the wastegate signal line, you can see it is in 2 different spots in my picture.

 

[7MGTEsup]

Looks like there is a third possible location, what difference would it make where it is located on the housing??

 

[s383mmber1]

Thanks for the pics guys. I will definitely get this from drift motion after I get my engine rebuilt. I don't want anything too crazy and my power goals are 350-400hp, this turbo would help me obtain that right?

Definatly. A member here made like 360-370 RWHP at 16 PSI on driftmotion's 57trim

And another member made 425++ on one.

 

[2543arvin]

Definatly. A member here made like 360-370 RWHP at 16 PSI on driftmotion's 57trim

And another member made 425++ on one.

I made 378 RWHP on the 57 trim at 14 psi. I love this turbo, its perfect for a street car thats looking for moderate power.

 

[pimptrizkit]

the spot near the A is not another spot for the signal line.

instead it's another mounting location for a waste gate, this front half of the turbo was used in the mr2 aswell guys. and their waste gate bolted to the undrilled/tapped hole and one of the other waste gate mounting holes.