My n/a dyno

greensupra_87

New Member
Jul 16, 2006
29
0
0
Winnipeg
Hi guys I don't think i've posted here yet but some you might know me from supraforums
finally dynod my car
490258_61_full.jpg

That spike that you see is due to acis tq goes down power goes up

first few runs were around 189-191 fp43psi
the thing ran rich
end result 200hp at 28psi of fuel pressure
timing at 15deg
you can check my cardomian for other mods
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/490258/
 

88YotaTurbo

New Member
Feb 26, 2006
658
0
0
40
Wolcott, Ct.
this clearly illustrates completely why i do not miss my n/a supra. Night and Day difference with a turbo man. But much respect. and welcome to Supramania
 

AJ'S 88NA

New Member
Jul 26, 2007
2,419
0
0
Florida
Not bad green. Your site on cardomain doesn't tell the rest of your mods. Looks like headers and cold air intake. What else?
 

greensupra_87

New Member
Jul 16, 2006
29
0
0
Winnipeg
-headers 2.5 exaust
-short ram intake (i'm not using that coldair anymore)
-msd 6al ss blaster coil
-15 deg timing
there is a lot of minor stuff but that's about it
 

CRE

7M-GE + MAFT Pro + T = :D
Oct 24, 2005
3,485
0
0
Denver, CO
200RWHP with nothing but headers, a blaster coil and intake sucking in hot air from the engine bay?????

Sorry, but I find it hard to believe that is anywhere near accurate.


EDIT: okay, I see you've moved the filter up behind the bumper. What else has been done? Or did the shop just take more off the head than they told you when they did the HG?
 
Last edited:

AJ'S 88NA

New Member
Jul 26, 2007
2,419
0
0
Florida
greensupra_87 said:
-headers 2.5 exaust
-short ram intake (i'm not using that coldair anymore)
-msd 6al ss blaster coil
-15 deg timing
there is a lot of minor stuff but that's about it
I've done a lot of major stuff and didn't get much over that.
 

greensupra_87

New Member
Jul 16, 2006
29
0
0
Winnipeg
CRE said:
200RWHP with nothing but headers, a blaster coil and intake sucking in hot air from the engine bay?????

Sorry, but I find it hard to believe that is anywhere near accurate.


EDIT: okay, I see you've moved the filter up behind the bumper. What else has been done? Or did the shop just take more off the head than they told you when they did the HG?
cre
i'm not using coldair intake anymore
btw the head was machined specifically more i'm guessing 9.5:1comp now
this is what i mean there is a lot of minor stuff like that:
spark plug indexing
the head had a 3angle valve job
no p/s
electric fan
lol
all remember more + post a recent pic soon
 

AJ'S 88NA

New Member
Jul 26, 2007
2,419
0
0
Florida
greensupra_87 said:
cre
i'm not using coldair intake anymore
btw the head was machined specifically more i'm guessing 9.5:1comp now
this is what i mean there is a lot of minor stuff like that:
spark plug indexing
the head had a 3angle valve job
no p/s
electric fan
lol
all remember more + post a recent pic soon
What we are saying it takes a lot to get 200 hp from a NA. Check my mods on my profile and I dynoed 215hp and 207torque without the Maft-Pro and 550 injectors. That was on a Dyno-Jet. Don't know that the Mustang would be very much different.
 

Tire Shredder

New Member
Sep 15, 2005
569
0
0
37
Oshawa
fantastic! my build entails porting and polishing and camshafts aswell. I am shooting for 200whp and this shows my goals are very attainable. I'll I've seen as far as graphs are piss-poor 200,000mile 155whp dynos. This truely does lift my spirits. congratulations on the great results! thanks for sharing!
 
Last edited:

greensupra_87

New Member
Jul 16, 2006
29
0
0
Winnipeg
AJ'S 88NA said:
What we are saying it takes a lot to get 200 hp from a NA. Check my mods on my profile and I dynoed 215hp and 207torque without the Maft-Pro and 550 injectors. That was on a Dyno-Jet. Don't know that the Mustang would be very much different.
I does take a lot to gain power, but that's why you cannot over look every little thing.
Do you have any dyno sheets/1/4 times?
what was the tq?
what was the a/f?
how much fp do you run?
I bet you could have gained another 10hp if turn down the fp
I just rememberd i have a fidanza flywheel + 6puck clutch
 

CRE

7M-GE + MAFT Pro + T = :D
Oct 24, 2005
3,485
0
0
Denver, CO
AJ, typically DynoJet's report higher than Mustang, from what I've seen it's usually between 10 and 15% higher.

Green, what are you tuning with and what are your AFRs at WOT?
 

AJ'S 88NA

New Member
Jul 26, 2007
2,419
0
0
Florida
greensupra_87 said:
I does take a lot to gain power, but that's why you cannot over look every little thing.
Do you have any dyno sheets/1/4 times?
what was the tq?
what was the a/f?
how much fp do you run?
I bet you could have gained another 10hp if turn down the fp
I just rememberd i have a fidanza flywheel + 6puck clutch
Yeah I've got dyno sheets.
Don't do 1/4 mile, don't see any listed for yours either, 1/4 mile times don't tell you HP.
Torque is listed in my post.
AFR for the dyno run was 13-13.5 and it's listed on the dyno sht. Tuned with an Apexi II. I think if I would have turned down the FP I really would have run lean.
FP 40 lbs. with stock injectors, stock pump, 12 deg. timing.
Lighter flywheel doesn't make more HP, nor the clutch. May help responce.
Anything else you'd like to know?

CRE thanks for the mustang to dynojet comp. If I had dynoed on a Mustang it would have been 10-15% less. 180-194hp. right?
 

CRE

7M-GE + MAFT Pro + T = :D
Oct 24, 2005
3,485
0
0
Denver, CO
I suspect Mr. Green's is running rather lean (found the sweet spot at around 15:1 AFR at WOT).

BTW, the stock injectors are specifiaed to flow between 290 and 330cc's, not 380. I see one more person say they're 380+ and I'm gonna kill someone.
 

Tire Shredder

New Member
Sep 15, 2005
569
0
0
37
Oshawa
definitely need to get a quality wideband on that car, don't want to be rebuilding the engine again soon. simply turning down fuel pressure until you make the most power is a great way to melt some ringlands