My FFIM pics (a little better this time)

logan

3 laws safe
Oct 4, 2005
109
0
0
U.S-U.K
Those two are different designs , right ? I happen to like the first one with the beveled sides . Hows it routed , ie keeping a/c , alt. bracket etc ?

Any pics of it installed ?
 

PowerTrip Performance

Custom Fabrication
Dec 5, 2005
209
0
0
Oregon
www.myspace.com
yrallofthenamestaken said:
I was not doubting your ability to produce a functioning manifold, my point is that you have no idea if all of the runners flow equally (or close). Now, lets say hypothetically that #1 is flowing considerably more air than 2-6 with this manifold. I go to tune my car to 12.0:1 on the dyno under boost, (not that i would tune that high but a lot of people do) what do you think will eventually happen?

I am not questioning your abilites, so please don't take it as such. Your design is not proven (just like all designs aren't at some point). I highly doubt Ron R. sold any manifolds before having them flow tested.

Prove your ffim design on a flow bench, sell it, and become an asset to the community.

-Charles

considering that this manifolds uses the stock runners (as do Rons) how much different could my manifolds numbers be from Rons, providing of course that I have a smooth transition from the plenum to the runners (which I do) We all know that the factory design is easy to improve on from a performance standpoint, not mention cosmeticly. So it stands to reason that this manifold will do wonders of improvement. All the key ingredients to a high performing manifold are here in my manifold. As I have mentioned before, in a perfect world, I would make the 7M manifold with straight runners and velocity stacks protruding into the plenum. But givin' space restrictions, its next to impossible. For risk of another discustion about this, I'll say this now, its pretty well known by those who know this stuff well, the runners furthest away from the throttle body get less air flow (scavanging) There is little that can be done about this, so we do what we can by increasing plenum volume, to make the air more plentiful, and tapering the plenum to hopefully increase velocity to the back cylinders, and of course make the transition from plenum to runners as smooth as possible. All things that are part of my manifold design. Wow, that was a mouthful, sorry.
 

sethron71

Authorized Vendor
Jul 19, 2005
871
0
16
40
Las Vegas, NV
www.SethIngham.com
PowerTrip Performance said:
Good question...I guess I just didn't want to copy Ron's design first of all. Then I wanted a design that would bring the largest volume of air possible into the plenums opening, then I wanted it to be tapered, then I wanted it to not just be a blunt flange welded to the runners, I wanted the plenum to sort of act as a velocity stack in its self. So I sat down with the pen and paper and sketched it out. Its real easy to draw something amazing on paper, and much more of a challenge to design something that can actually be made into true form. I really liked it, it has good lines (much like good body lines on a vehicle) It is unique, its got function, and it should make increadible power, and it'll fit. The one you guys saw is the prototype (first of) I have plans to clean it up a bit, I want less welds showing, and less of the stock mounting flange. I would really like to do one with straight runners (velocity stacks of course) but with the back two runners barely having enough room as is, I don't think that will be a possability? Anyways, sorry to run on and on. Thanks though Sethron.

Just to give ya a pointer if you use a thicker base you can make nice ports much easier. Like this:
sm_photo_missing.jpg

As for the straight off the header I have a setup with velocity stacks that I am working on, search on SF for a post about velocity stacks internally there is a very interesting post about it! Mine will actually be having fully custom built runner that come up to a 90 and sit the housing upright but or I may actually go almost 180 to make the runners longer! But that will come down the road. As well you do not have to go so far outside the box to not copy someone. A manifold like this I recently built is something new in that it retains alternator and A/C but is the short runner tappered design. This is something different from anyone esle yet combines a lot of ideas from others:
sm_photo_missing.jpg


You will amaze yourself with the ideas you can come up with by having input and ideas from others and then putting your own flair on it!! Best of luck, let me know if you have any questions or and I got a proposition for you about the Alt Brackets!

Seth
 

PowerTrip Performance

Custom Fabrication
Dec 5, 2005
209
0
0
Oregon
www.myspace.com
sethron71 said:
Just to give ya a pointer if you use a thicker base you can make nice ports much easier. Like this:
sm_photo_missing.jpg

As for the straight off the header I have a setup with velocity stacks that I am working on, search on SF for a post about velocity stacks internally there is a very interesting post about it! Mine will actually be having fully custom built runner that come up to a 90 and sit the housing upright but or I may actually go almost 180 to make the runners longer! But that will come down the road. As well you do not have to go so far outside the box to not copy someone. A manifold like this I recently built is something new in that it retains alternator and A/C but is the short runner tappered design. This is something different from anyone esle yet combines a lot of ideas from others:
sm_photo_missing.jpg


I've got a lot of ideas for FFIM's as well, this was just one that I thought of, made, and was happy with. I've got an idea for one thats pretty wild, way different from any conventional designs. I don't own an MK3 myself anymore, so I just have limited interest on how far I wanna go with these. I don't want to spend a bunch of time and money just to show off, and have something for people to google at. Be careful with the runner length and bends, if you are going for a torque monster it should work out well, but you might loose some HP on the top end. Its really cool that we can all gather here and chat about this stuff. I love the useful input. If we all put our heads together on one project, we could have a truly amazing outcome. Keep up the good work Seth.

P.S. hit me up via PM on your propsition on the brackets.
 

PowerTrip Performance

Custom Fabrication
Dec 5, 2005
209
0
0
Oregon
www.myspace.com
Seth, here is one I did for a Honda, the intire runner is a true velocity stack, not just added to the end of the port. Could do something like this for the 7M but not sure if there would be enough room back there? But still have my other top secret idea for a future build.
 

Attachments

  • ptpvelocity1.JPG
    ptpvelocity1.JPG
    51.3 KB · Views: 33

sethron71

Authorized Vendor
Jul 19, 2005
871
0
16
40
Las Vegas, NV
www.SethIngham.com
PowerTrip Performance said:
Seth, here is one I did for a Honda, the intire runner is a true velocity stack, not just added to the end of the port. Could do something like this for the 7M but not sure if there would be enough room back there? But still have my other top secret idea for a future build.

Very Nice I like that a lot!!

Seth
 

PowerTrip Performance

Custom Fabrication
Dec 5, 2005
209
0
0
Oregon
www.myspace.com
jmcboost said:
Where is a good place to get the aluminum?

Where do you live? I've got my connections here in Oregon, but wouldn't do you any good unless you're local. Most any machine/fab shops could sell it to you, or any place that sells steel, hell even a welding supply store could send you in the right dirrection.
 

PowerTrip Performance

Custom Fabrication
Dec 5, 2005
209
0
0
Oregon
www.myspace.com
Hey Seth, how 'bout this one buddy? I could build it...it would be bad...but probably won't build it until I have a buyer. (Velocity stack runners, about 6" runner length) This would be the one to flow bench.
 

Attachments

  • velocity7Mptp 002.jpg
    velocity7Mptp 002.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 23