yrallofthenamestaken said:I was not doubting your ability to produce a functioning manifold, my point is that you have no idea if all of the runners flow equally (or close). Now, lets say hypothetically that #1 is flowing considerably more air than 2-6 with this manifold. I go to tune my car to 12.0:1 on the dyno under boost, (not that i would tune that high but a lot of people do) what do you think will eventually happen?
I am not questioning your abilites, so please don't take it as such. Your design is not proven (just like all designs aren't at some point). I highly doubt Ron R. sold any manifolds before having them flow tested.
Prove your ffim design on a flow bench, sell it, and become an asset to the community.
-Charles
PowerTrip Performance said:Good question...I guess I just didn't want to copy Ron's design first of all. Then I wanted a design that would bring the largest volume of air possible into the plenums opening, then I wanted it to be tapered, then I wanted it to not just be a blunt flange welded to the runners, I wanted the plenum to sort of act as a velocity stack in its self. So I sat down with the pen and paper and sketched it out. Its real easy to draw something amazing on paper, and much more of a challenge to design something that can actually be made into true form. I really liked it, it has good lines (much like good body lines on a vehicle) It is unique, its got function, and it should make increadible power, and it'll fit. The one you guys saw is the prototype (first of) I have plans to clean it up a bit, I want less welds showing, and less of the stock mounting flange. I would really like to do one with straight runners (velocity stacks of course) but with the back two runners barely having enough room as is, I don't think that will be a possability? Anyways, sorry to run on and on. Thanks though Sethron.
sethron71 said:Just to give ya a pointer if you use a thicker base you can make nice ports much easier. Like this:
As for the straight off the header I have a setup with velocity stacks that I am working on, search on SF for a post about velocity stacks internally there is a very interesting post about it! Mine will actually be having fully custom built runner that come up to a 90 and sit the housing upright but or I may actually go almost 180 to make the runners longer! But that will come down the road. As well you do not have to go so far outside the box to not copy someone. A manifold like this I recently built is something new in that it retains alternator and A/C but is the short runner tappered design. This is something different from anyone esle yet combines a lot of ideas from others:
I've got a lot of ideas for FFIM's as well, this was just one that I thought of, made, and was happy with. I've got an idea for one thats pretty wild, way different from any conventional designs. I don't own an MK3 myself anymore, so I just have limited interest on how far I wanna go with these. I don't want to spend a bunch of time and money just to show off, and have something for people to google at. Be careful with the runner length and bends, if you are going for a torque monster it should work out well, but you might loose some HP on the top end. Its really cool that we can all gather here and chat about this stuff. I love the useful input. If we all put our heads together on one project, we could have a truly amazing outcome. Keep up the good work Seth.
P.S. hit me up via PM on your propsition on the brackets.
jt2ma71 said:The runners farthest from the tb or at the end of the plenum then to get more airflow, not less.
Nice looking manifold, BTW.
~Ron
PowerTrip Performance said:Seth, here is one I did for a Honda, the intire runner is a true velocity stack, not just added to the end of the port. Could do something like this for the 7M but not sure if there would be enough room back there? But still have my other top secret idea for a future build.
jmcboost said:Where is a good place to get the aluminum?
jmcboost said:Where is a good place to get the aluminum?