Never seen this one before.. but man that quarter is horrible.
http://www.stangbangers.com/89_LX5-0_vs_Competition.htm
http://www.stangbangers.com/89_LX5-0_vs_Competition.htm
MKIII vs a bunch of different cars comparison
- Thread starter SupraOfDoom
- Start date
yeah turbo supra's are kinda slow stock. They werent made to go fast in a straight line. its a Touring car.
I think they were designed to enjoy the ride rather than see how fast you can get your ride done.
it's not a very good test considering the tires on al the cars wheren't the same...
the celica should have done MUCH better, but it had shit tires on it...
the celica should have done MUCH better, but it had shit tires on it...
I know I saw this article, and probably still have it in my magazine collection of old. The sad part of my collection is, I probably bought that magazine as a Mustang lover. I had 4 60's model Stangs growing up.
What seems odd tho, is how the article was set up for the Mustang to win. I guess if they had used the price of the Mustang GT, something else would have been the best bang for the buck.
What seems odd tho, is how the article was set up for the Mustang to win. I guess if they had used the price of the Mustang GT, something else would have been the best bang for the buck.
The 20th Anniversary TTA is the best car on the list hands down! I would love to find one of those in good shape. Nice looking car with the Grand National drivetrain :drool:
Last edited:
csnow said:
The owner of the Chevrolet dealership two blocks from my house has a beautiful red one, I'll have to get some picks of it :love:
The TTA only came in white if I recall correctly. It may have been repainted or its just a regular TA.
like a gnx drive drain? and by the way why did they test a lx stang why not a gt i hate lx fox bodys but i like the 87 and up gt's and the old school svo's go figure
