Nah, didn't disagree THAT much because I knew it wouldn't be some carbed motor from the 50's in the most technologicly advanced car Toyota made at the time.
svnmpwr;1489198 said:Well how about i bring my car up to kennedale raceway near ft worth and you can meet me there, and I'll run your technologically advanced car with my carbed 50's motor?
svnmpwr;1489203 said:Kennedale TX, its near ft worth.
nick88;1489209 said:No, I'll race you if you can make it up to the track at Kansas City.
That is, if you don't have to change the jets in your carb to come up here.
svnmpwr;1489223 said:Ok, I'll be sure to bring you a couple spare headgaskets i have so you can make it back home.
nick88;1489228 said:Alright, I'll let you know your searching skills suck, especially when you should click on the link in my sig. to see that I have no use for said spare headgaskets.
svnmpwr;1489241 said:Looks good, i love that interior.
nick88;1489247 said:Thanks.
How do you plan on running the fuel pump, tach, and all of the other electronics that are dependent on the stock ecu?
foreverpsycotic;1489282 said:Tach signal converter.
svnmpwr;1489198 said:Well how about i bring my car up to kennedale raceway near ft worth and you can meet me there, and I'll run your technologically advanced car with my carbed 50's motor?
Suprapowaz!(2);1489329 said:Hot damn Poodles, you just got called out son. I'd like to see this race go down. Vids too please.
svnmpwr: why not 406? You'd get more power under the curve. Would make a better dragstrip motor wouldn't it?
foreverpsycotic;1489244 said:^^ Nice big bag o torque would be a helper
Lets stop all the shittalking before it gets outa hand.
And IJ., I still disagree. There are people here with the same level of builds that have not blown up like your threads. You get the attention because its you