jdub said:Bondie - You ever been in a combat aircraft trying to ID ground vehicles from 10,000 feet or higher? Working a "kill box" in which no friendly forces are supposed to enter or be present? Ever have to make a combat decision to fire or not in seconds?
I have...in a "fast mover"...a heck of a lot faster than an A-10.
There have been friendly fire incidents in every war ever fought...the differences today is the pace which combat occurs. In Iraq and Afghanistan it's compounded by the nature of the conflict...the enemy gets in close and a bomb (no matter how "smart") and cannon fire is not very discriminate. Just to illustrate the point, 24% of the 148 Americans killed in Desert Storm resulted from fratricide:
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabh.htm
And how many Americans have been killed in Iraq compared to British?
It's pretty easy for the media to throw stones...bet you that the folks writing these articles have never served. This is especially true of the British tabloids like the Sun (like these guys are credible)...sensationalism is the name of the game. Ever consider that a video like this is a compromise? Weapons symbology, sensor imagery and weapon ranges are all very useful to an enemy...ever thought that's why this kind of video is not made public? The media wants to sell papers...they pine for this kind of thing...they have no regard for the reasons that the US military (or the British military) has to keep this info from being made public.
And here is another thing to consider. It is American jets providing close air support to ground forces that include British and Canadian units. Ever considered how many times these jets have saved lives by preventing the enemy from getting in close enough to kill coalition soldiers? You won't hear about that in the media...it doesn't sell papers. American troops make up the overwhelming majority of combat forces around the world, and are therefore more likely to be involved in friendly-fire incidents.
The US DoD provided info and this video to the British MoD concerning this incident...that is done in an effort to keep it from happening again. We do not make the names of the individuals public...it serves no purpose other than to satisfy the media and it opens up these individuals to lawsuits. You can call it "stonewalling" if you like, but there is a big difference between a crime and a mistake. If these two pilots had violated the rules of engagement, they would have been punished...they knew that. Maybe you should consider that these pilots will have to live with that mistake the rest of their life.
If you think for one second that these American officers intentionally and knowingly attacked British APC's...then you are full of shit.
.
Amen