Max power on a stock CT-26? (searched)

D

Doward

Banned
Jan 11, 2006
4,245
0
36
Alachua, FL
Did a search, but I'm not coming up with much...

I'd like to find out what kind of power you guys have run, at what boost levels and modifications, on the stock CT-26 turbo.

I'm wondering if 320rwhp is do-able, with say... 3" turbo back exhaust, upgraded hard pipes, and a MAFT-Pro, on stock fueling.
 
Jspec7m88

Jspec7m88

New Member
Dec 3, 2005
1,583
0
0
Nappy City
I'm not sure about stock fueling...but I know there are boys out there that have broke past the 300rwhp marker on a stock CT. With a freshly rebuilt stocker in good condition, 320rwhp is very doalbe if you have the supporting mods...but by this point, I would think that you are pushing the CT pretty darn hard...
 
Jspec7m88

Jspec7m88

New Member
Dec 3, 2005
1,583
0
0
Nappy City
Well..boost levels are a different story. I know people running more boost then that(LexAFM or MAFT) on a stock CT and are just fine.
 
D

Doward

Banned
Jan 11, 2006
4,245
0
36
Alachua, FL
I'm talking a MAFT-Pro tuned stocker with a 3" exhaust (turbo all the way back) hard pipes, maybe an IC upgrade, and 13-15psi.
 
Jspec7m88

Jspec7m88

New Member
Dec 3, 2005
1,583
0
0
Nappy City
^^^LOL:momaru:

Well...in that case, w/ those mod's as you just listed...(depending on tuning), there is no reason why that can't produce 300rwhp.
 
M

mtoxracerfss

Boost Addict
Oct 8, 2005
177
0
0
40
Toledo
On my old supra i ran 361RWHP on a stock non-upgraded CT26 boosting at 14psi. I did however have full fuel system upgrade, hardpipes, full 3" exhaust, safcII, intercooler and etc.

I have since got a whole new turbo and setup but im MORE THAN SURE you can get 300hp. crank the boost up to 11-12psi and your almost there. Theres a lot of power in the exhaust as well! like a whole new car!
 
Jspec7m88

Jspec7m88

New Member
Dec 3, 2005
1,583
0
0
Nappy City
mtoxracerfss said:
On my old supra i ran 361RWHP on a stock non-upgraded CT26 boosting at 14psi. I did however have full fuel system upgrade, hardpipes, full 3" exhaust, safcII, intercooler and etc.
Click to expand...
 
Nick M

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
Sep 9, 2005
8,897
40
48
U.S.
www.ebay.com
The intercooler is more important than the hard pipes. This does not include old worn piping as a comparison.
 
Last edited:
shaeff

shaeff

Kurt is FTMFW x2!!!!
Staff member
Super Moderator
Mar 30, 2005
10,589
10
38
Around
Jspec7m88 said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtoxracerfss
On my old supra i ran 361RWHP on a stock non-upgraded CT26 boosting at 14psi. I did however have full fuel system upgrade, hardpipes, full 3" exhaust, safcII, intercooler and etc.
Click to expand...

i doubt that. and on the stock I/C no less. that's incredibly doubtful. i'm willing to put money on it that the dyno was mis-calibrated quite a bit.

-shaeff
 
D

Doward

Banned
Jan 11, 2006
4,245
0
36
Alachua, FL
Joel, you are the man! I have no idea why that didn't come up in my search :3d_frown:

300 is pushing it, eh? Guess I'll be going 57 trim quicker than I thought :D
 
Joel W.

Joel W.

Just A Jedi
Nov 7, 2005
1,561
0
0
Washington
It's hard searching for ct info because almost every other thread mentions it, I just remembered it was in Shaeff's thread. It took me a while to find it..

I don't know if it's correct...:biglaugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom