IJ.;1798556 said:It's not a case of "if" they will crack it's more "when" and personally as I said earlier I wouldn't use them on a road car ever.
Same here.
IJ.;1798556 said:It's not a case of "if" they will crack it's more "when" and personally as I said earlier I wouldn't use them on a road car ever.
NashMan;1798560 said:Never said mine will never crack, you made it out like they will crack with in a week of use. I am over half the life of my rotors as well just about time for new set
and I drive my shit hard with in limts of the speed limt some what
it all comes down to the casting and how there drilled and prepped after words.
NashMan;1798560 said:and I drive my shit hard with in limts of the speed limt some what
it all comes down to the casting and how there drilled and prepped after words.
IJ.;1798556 said:Might come down to time/miles used and driving style.
Poodles;1798563 said:Yes, and when they fail from the cracking, what happens then?
IBoughtASupra;1798573 said:Mike, when you say not to run the drilled setup on a road car, do you mean street or road coarse. Just wanted to verify.
Supracentral;1798576 said:Personally I don't like them. You can achieve the same pad outgassing with slotted rotors without the risk of cracking as easily. Hard pull downs from high speed highway runs can do it. Road course definitely will do it eventually. For most street driving, it might take a long time, possibly never, it really depending on how hard you drive. One mans causal ride in the country is another guys run of insanity. It's really a matter of perspective.
One thing to note is all iron discs can experience cracking, not just crossdrilled. Crossdrilling just makes it more likely to happen. Here's something most people don't know; The angled vanes in a non-solid rotor were put there to help stop cracking. The theory was that by placing a solid vane along the path of a crack would stop it. The cooling aspect was a secondary design result, not the primary reason.
Slotted rotors are a better choice IMO, the shallow sharp edges of the radial grooves provide leading edges for bite and way for hot gasses and ablated friction material from the pad to exit. This ensures full pad contact even under brutal braking conditions. They are a far superior design if you feel the need to run something beyond a solid disc.
However, on my car I run solid discs. When you're stressing the brakes as much as I do on a road course, solid discs are the best design IMO.
NashMan;1798623 said:
Was answered in post #17...NashMan;1798720 said:but still hoping some one can answer my qestion, do yellow stuff pads eat rotors? because I am going to need a new set of pads for when I get my car running again
IJ.;1798726 said:Was answered in post #17...
wiseco7mgt;1798738 said:I used to buy from a company called RDA when i managed a parts shop years ago and they told me of a few companies that still drilled there discs even though they were aware of the cracking issues. RDA used a dimpling design which didn't effect the structural integrity of the disc, so no cracking issues. I think they still make them.
It's a 2 tonne SC400 with a blower, he ran the Mk4 callipers with Toyota pads on Cryo'd 4000 DBA rotors and it destroyed them in a very short time, the Yellows on Cryo'd 5000's would be maybe 1/4 the wear in about the same time, I have enough confidence in this combination that it's on my new project as I'm MUCH easier on brakes than Al is.NashMan;1798776 said:what would you use as a comparison?
pads I have ran are
stock oem
trd
hawk hps
proter feild rs
He doesn't have a lot of finessetoyotanos;1798785 said:Kinda wish I had gotten a ride with him. V says I'm an aggressive driver, so if you say he's bad, I'm definately interested