mnracer550;1807218 said:i think a SBC in a supra is much different. im replacing a blown up wankle that i dont wanna rebuild every 20k miles (saying i made the same smae power as my current goals) with engine that will be more reliable and produce great power. i guess i would compare it to a 1uz swap.
I keep wondering when GM is gonna step up with some new tech, The LS series is getting a little old to still be in there flagship models IMO. U'd think they will have to compete with fords new 5.0IBoughtASupra;1807219 said:I wonder how much power would be made if the LS7 was a Dual Overhead VVT cam setup. Hmmm.
So what's stopping you?mnracer550;1807216 said:btw id LOVE to pick up the new 5.0! im glad ford steped up and used some new technology to make some serious power instead of using a push rod engine. .
IBoughtASupra;1807219 said:I wonder how much power would be made if the LS7 was a Dual Overhead VVT cam setup. Hmmm.
I'd guess you'd pick up at least another 100 or 150hp pretty easily. If Ford can make ~420-440hp with 5.0 liters, without doing anything drastic, I figure 600-620 would be pretty easy with similar specs. Question though: why bother? The LS7 already revs to over 7000, makes 500+ easily, and is LIGHT. How much weight would adding 3 extra cams, an extra chain or belt (not to mention longer), and 16 extra (albeit smaller) valves add up to? I imagine it would be a negligible amount, but it's a fine edged sword with a proper sports car. Power is only part of the equation, I would prefer balance myself.mnracer550;1807253 said:I keep wondering when GM is gonna step up with some new tech, The LS series is getting a little old to still be in there flagship models IMO. U'd think they will have to compete with fords new 5.0
mnracer550;1807252 said:lol still not happening. and i dont see the point in going with a a chev engine over ford. parts really are not any cheaper. does no one car about building something unique? everyone puts 350s in everything. there a good motor, i get that. but i dont having what everyone else has,there plenty of 350 fc rx7s around mn but i havnt seen one ford swap. i want something different. so when most people go the cheap way and go sbc, i will stay brand loyal and put a trusty ford engine in it. im sure there are plenty of guys that have dealt a little more with ford setups that can chime in.
mnracer550;1807705 said:2000 is about as much as im looking at spending on the engine. if i got 302 it will be getting 2 ct26s or one hx40. the last 302 i built had pretty much your above idea along with a stock rebuild and weisco pistons at 9.5/1. i just like the idea that ford is heading in the right direction and utilizing new technology and im sure building on it.
Buddy of mine was going to stuff a 7m in his FC until a bit of reality hit him, and he realized that it would be basically good for straight line driving only, and that all the reinforcing he would have needed to do to keep the torque from breaking the car in half would have made it just as heavy as a Supra, or near enough it didn't matter... so he stuck with the rotary.IJ.;1807741 said:You like the New Tech/Direction but are still going to use a Casst Iron lump to make a Lead Tipped Lawn Dart... ok..
I can agree with you there, 100%. Do it how you want the first time, and hopefully it turns out to be exactly what you were wanting.mnracer550;1807965 said:anyways iv decided to go with the 302 the whole swap and turbo setup at once. no point in building it twice.
You know, you guys keep it up with sticking archaic engines in a car that was built 100% for handling, and you're going to make that crazy rotary engine the "unique" swap. :rofl:mnracer550;1808047 said:there are 2 ls1 FC rx7s here in duluth mn alone. no 302s. i actually dont know of one 302 swapped FC rx7 in mn. although there are many 350 swaps of all different sorts. and i will me the only turbo 302 in mn for sure. i still havnt seen one on the net either. even if theres 100 in the country or whatever it is id still sya thats pretty unique.
mnracer550;1808343 said:you made absolutely no point of why the ford engine is a bad choice, its a roller engine with forged internals which is great for a cheap engine to boost. in my OP i stated a chev engine will not be going in the car then restated it many times after. I was looking for opinions on ford engine options.