Supracentral;1408797 said:
Can you explain the logic behind this? If I murder you because your skin is a certain color, I should be punished. But if I kill you for some other reason, your life is worth less and I should get less punishment?"?
If you're murdering someone and its provoked because of race/minority and they didnt "trigger" the attack then yeah you should get a major charge against you. Racism and hate against minorities needs to go away and this law helps that. If the murder is provoked then yes it should be a smaller sentence because it wouldnt have happened other wise. Personally on the subject of murder I think the sentence should be chosen by the victums family, or if you kill someone....you die too, accidental or not.
Supracentral;1408797 said:
So "beating a defenseless kid because your a barbaric animal" in your mind is better than "beating a defenseless kid because you don't like his skin color"?
I understand your point but its the law of course there holes in every situation. Of course this kid should get the same charge hate crime or not but it should be on the same level of what a hate crime calls for.
The reason Im for the hate crime charges is b/c people of different races shouldn't be a victum just b/c of their race and shouldnt have to deal with people harassing them. They may be able to possibly remind the agressor that it is a hate crime can maybe make them think twice b4 they attack or kill them.
Ultimatly society really needs people to have a license to have kids. This is just the result of shit parenting.