has any one taken apar the black box on the afm

jetjock

creepy-ass cracka
Jul 11, 2005
9,439
0
0
Redacted per Title 18 USC Section 798
Jdub: Yeah, I've gone back to the stock setup with a WIX. I might try the PureOne in the future. Fwiw I had the same kind of oil analysis results when using the Bracket oiled filter verus stock paper on a few airplanes too.

In all fairness to Shaeff we were talking about the K&N. Based on that homebrewed test the other filter he mentioned appears a good mix of flow and filtration. If I was highly modified and was using a high flow induction system and couldn't use the stock airbox I'd probably use that. The bottom line though is it still wouldn't filter as well as paper. Even the Delco should flow more than enough in the same situation. The issue would be mounting it.

At any rate I wouldn't use a K&N unless it had a precharger on it and since that brings filtration closer to stock why do it? I suppose if I lived in a very clean area (say the PNW) I might accept more engine wear with less filtration but I wouldn't be that happy about doing it. I do kinda miss that turbo sucking whine the K&N offered but I can live without it. All this is my two cents of course...others can do what as they wish.
 
Last edited:

jdub

Official SM Expert: Motor Oil, Lubricants & Fil
SM Expert
Feb 10, 2006
10,730
1
38
Valley of the Sun
jetjock said:
Jdub: Yeah, I've gone back to the stock setup with a WIX. I might try the PureOne in the future. Fwiw I had the same kind of oil analysis results when using the Bracket oiled filter verus stock paper on a few airplanes too.

In all fairness to Shaeff we were talking about the K&N. Based on that homebrewed test the other filter he mentioned appears a good mix of flow and filtration. If I was highly modified and was using a high flow induction system and couldn't use the stock airbox I'd probably use that. The bottom line though is it still wouldn't filter as well as paper. Even the Delco should flow more than enough in the same situation. The issue would be mounting it.

At any rate I wouldn't use a K&N unless it had a precharger on it and since that brings filtration closer to stock why do it? I suppose if I lived in a very clean area (say the PNW) I might accept more engine wear with less filtration but I wouldn't be that happy about doing it. I do kinda miss that turbo sucking whine the K&N offered but I can live without it. All this is my two cents of course...others can do what as they wish.

Hmmm...and of course, I live in one of the most dusty areas of the country you can imagine :3d_frown:

Guess it's time to fab a box and get rid of the K&N.
 

NashMan

WTF did he just wright ?
Aug 5, 2005
4,940
17
38
43
Victoria BC
know fact that the apexi flow more then k&N i tried em both out now the reson being is this my intake noise incresed when i put the apexi on

and it has bean tested in alot of mags jap ones

k&n are great for map based cars any thign that is hot wire karma ect it will over time coat stuff in oil

now another agument that i get is the over oiling issues i ahve oiled alot fo filter in my life and you knwo what ever out fo the package then tend to drip/spray oil

and the blizt one is crappy filter but don't quote me on that that is what i have herd
 

NashMan

WTF did he just wright ?
Aug 5, 2005
4,940
17
38
43
Victoria BC
miggles said:
ive been running a blitz sus filter for over 5yrs. Had no problems with it. Love the induction sound.

ok never used one so i can say nothing

but i do liek the point that it clean able and never ever ware's out


oh yae i know of peron that bought ebay vertion and it sucked alot it let ton of drit into his car and dusted it to death so he sasy