Im looking to replace the fuel filter, but not sure what to go with. The stocker looks like a good option concidering I have the Walbro. Any objections? Any other opinions? Im looking to keep the modification down to a minimum. Thanks in advance.
KeithH said:Just out of curiosity... why replace the filter?
MKIIINA said:the stocker is designed to last the life of the car....just fyi
http://supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=219703adampecush said:define the life of the car for me...
GrimJack said:Ironically, I hear that the reason it's a lifetime filter is because it really doesn't filter much of anything. I have no idea how true this is, though I suppose it wouldn't be to hard to figure out, just chop apart an old filter and see what type of element it has in it...
or tom foolery :biglaugh:supra90turbo said:I'll cut my 170,000+mi one open in the name of science!
CryoSlash said:or tom foolery :biglaugh:
suprarx7nut said:Do you have a loss of power(or low idle) or trouble starting in colder weather? I just replaced mine (regular maintenence every 4 years for honda) and appearantly those are the tell tale signs.
jetjock said:There are rare exceptions but the vast majority of fuel filters are needlessly changed. People change them for the same reason they still their change oil and oil filter at 3K miles: they're ignorant. As for not understanding how they can be lifetime go to a junkyard and find one to cut open. Find one with the highest mileage you can. That way before you examine it's internal construction to see why it can be lifetime you can also test it. The odds are overwhelming it'll be fine.
All that said why would someone change a fuel filter when it can be tested in 5 seconds without even getting their hands dirty? Or verified a second way in 2 minutes? Does anyone really think professional mechanics (competent ones at least) swapped out hard to get at fuel filters when diagnosing drivability problems?