cant we all just get along :cry:
they are supras..... all of them
dont diss on each other for aesthetics
they are supras..... all of them
dont diss on each other for aesthetics
ILikeCarsYesIDo said:89+ taillights for the win.
Sorry. But pre-89's just remind me too much of the same era Celicas.
Jaguar said:All of these strong opinions here. Whether u think they suck, or think they rock, 89+ or pre-89 it doesn't matter... they both look better smoked.* Click the link in my sig and be a part of the smoked tails group buy.
*Pre-89 smoked tails have not yet been confirmed as there has not been enough interest so far. If you pre-89 guys want some smoked tails, you need to make your presence known in the group buy thread.
I see that and raise you adugums said:If Jeff is allowed to break out the Buick picture, than here you go:
born2drv said:I have the pre-89 tails... .infact I have a mint condition set of refurbished ones with clear lenses I paid $600 for and shipped from the UK! Here's a pic:
I like the 89+ as well don't get me wrong. But my car is an 88, I love my car, and there's very little aesthetics/looks-wise I wish to change. It's like a philosophical thing... why not change to a 93+ rear spoiler? Everyone has their preferences. If you're determined to change so many things about your car why not just get the car you want?
BTW: I had tinted tail lights before and it looked good I thought, but I prefer a nice clean stock looking set instead.
Dear God that is beautiful! That is how I plan to do mine. Did you use niteshades or what?dugums said:All in: