MK3Hitman21;1909274 said:The 1j has the better head, and the 2j has the better block. Better turbo cause there steel in usdm and more ccs in the injector displacement
gurley0916;1909291 said:2j flows better. And 2js can rev as well as a 1j if it has springs and retainers. Both can achieve 8k
MK3Hitman21;1909310 said:Yes they are great platforms totally agree. But there is a but, peak power for the one jay it handles more then the 2j.And that's because of o the the short rods and head design. Which the 2j was piggyback off the 1j design that Yamaha help make and stamp.
MK3Hitman21;1909091 said:sorry to say 1jz are way better then the 2j. yea nice to have forged internals blah blah and a stock block can be a dyno queen handle up to 1000 horses. but hey 500 hp 1j will walk a 1000 hp 2j cause the fucker wont hook! also to mention a 1j Peak Power : 280PS (206 kW) @ 6200rpm
Peak Torque : 37.0 kgm (268 lb ft, 363 Nm) @ 4800rpm 2j■Max Power: 209 @ 5600 (280 hp)
■Torque (nm) 46.0 @ 3600 (338ft/lb )those shorter rods and yahmaha heads is what does the trick for the 1j... meaning it can hold the power better at higher rpms.
gurley0916;1909313 said:Oh god I give up...1j owners like talking to a brick wall...
Turbo Habanero;1909340 said:Ahaha
Oh wait im a 1jz owner
MK3Hitman21;1909342 said:Talking about stock to stock. And I was referring to what was said a few pages back when they were going back n forth about 1j 2j. Just stating how peak power no matter the build the 1j handles it better at peak or high rpms
MK3Hitman21;1909351 said:Your right 600 rpms don't make a difference I'm wrong.
AbsoluteSpeed;1909354 said:Looks like we found snowman 2.0 :3d_frown: