Evilempire1.3JZ-GTE said:
LOL yes it is wrong!
because the women who won the picture should say its deffective and i want my money back!
Au contrair, a picture can't be defective, and IF IT STATES IN THE ADD THE ITEM IS ONLY A PICTURE, then LEGALLY nothing wrong was done, per my understanding. Like I said, unethical, very much so; nothing illegal.
Evilempire1.3JZ-GTE said:
and then when they tryed to do that they got lashed by the husband and got falsified negative feedback because it was a missleading add!!
Big deal, the husband was a smartass.
They've already reported the negative feedback to eBay, thats not something they're gonna go to court over.
Evilempire1.3JZ-GTE said:
it is like saying i could counter fit money because in microscopic print hidden on my fake money i put "not intended for real currency" and go and spend it but they take it as cash and not catch the person until later and trying to tell the fbi and feds see i put "not intended for real currency" let me go why arrest me?
No its not at all the same, because there is a LAW saying you may not actually print anything even somewhat similarly resembles official US currency.
suprahero said:
That's a pretty cool trick Mr. Evilempire. Now my girlfriend and I can type secret messages back and forth and my wife will never know what's going on.............:biglaugh:
Yeah, I'm going to cheat on a woman that is gorgeous, a great cook. loves supras, and loves to go racing.................not going to happen...........:biglaugh:
No one accused you of cheating. That seems like an awful lot of denial for something no one ever thought happened. When you deny something in excess, you know what that means......
Is there something you need to tell us, Suprahero? Or perhaps, more importantly, something you need to tell Vixen?
LOLOLOLOLOL JP Jay, JP.
