jetjock;1814375 said:
It actually means the opposite. Not that it applies to the OP now that he's fessed up.
Ahh... reading it again, I would interpret that to mean that if the cops are harassing you needlessly or violating your constitutional rights, they're opening themselves up to lawsuits. Granted, I thought it meant that they could do whatever they like (to an extent) because of what I've seen in the past. Moot point now though.
destrux;1814503 said:
I'm not sure if you've ever driven a car with dark tint before... but making sharp turns at night sucks, you can't see shit out the side windows. So before you tint yours maybe see if a friend with tint will let you take their car for a spin at night through a city/town so you can see if you like it. My wife has tint on her car and it's really annoying at night driving around town.
Not a bad idea at all. Living in a well lit city, having tint isn't so bad. Living in the sticks in the winter, where your windows are up, and it's dark and cold by 5pm or so, it kinda sucks having tint at night. Well, giving another car a shot before spending the money tinting your own, I'd agree, is a good idea.
Canuckrz;1814598 said:
Also I always stagger my tint front to rear; the rear being darker than the fronts to make the fronts slightly less obviously tinted. Here tinting the front windows at all is illegal.
I did that with my 88, went something like 5% on the rear 3 windows, and whatever was Arizona legal up front, it did make the fronts seem "lighter" than they really were, but Utah tried telling me it was illegal to have them that dark. Kindly reminded them I didn't live in Utah, nor was my car registered there, and they sent me on my way. Revenue collecting bastards down there, I swear.
Why is tinting illegal where you live? That seems silly to completely outlaw it. Do they outlaw driving with sunglasses too?