driving with no hood?
- Thread starter prism1
- Start date
- Status
mkIIIman089;1158818 said:
Woah, where have you been lately??? I haven't seen you post in a while!
TurboFreak;1158839 said:
Been quite thoroughly consumed in the real world. LOL. I just happen to have a bit of a dead spot during the off season here.
This is pretty dumb. I can't believe I'm seeing something like this here. You say theft is no problem? It doesn't matter if you're stock or not, people can just steal your parts then sell them to other people, if not save them as replacements for their own supras. Not to mention threat of rain, etc.
Didn't someone get their 7m's head stolen in a parking lot?
if they did that with a locked hood, imagine what can be done to your car?
if they did that with a locked hood, imagine what can be done to your car?
Aren’t you N/A Not to ruin your parade but there’s nothing really impressive about that.
LOL I see all the things being said and you all make good points. I am an na. But I think I have a very decent engine bay for an na. And in all honesty I just want to k ow if it was leagal. You guys are starti g to sound like the suffaforums members. LOL. It's just a question relax man. Haha
i remeber seeing a ford probe with no hood parked at the mall then it started to rain i just started laughing it was pretty funny
prism1;1159300 said:
Due to the fact that you want to remove the hood to show off the engine, it's a stupid idea.
If your hood was in the paint shop or you had a legit excuse for it, and then put it back on as soon as you got it back, that would be acceptable. Unfortunately, that is not the case, and it's a very, very stupid idea.
Doesn't matter if you're NA or turbo, don't do it.
You'd get owned in Fresno anyways. :rofl:
This is no different than someone who feels to share their love of Akon music, so they open their trunk to share that music with everyone.
I see nothing wrong with it.
I see nothing wrong with it.
you can always ask a local law enforcement officer of the legality of the subject.
personally if i had done alot of work on my engine and im proud of it, i wouldnt want to give the birds a chance to use my engine as a liter box. not to mention people are assholes in general, so while someone might not take something ill bet they will try fucking with something
personally if i had done alot of work on my engine and im proud of it, i wouldnt want to give the birds a chance to use my engine as a liter box. not to mention people are assholes in general, so while someone might not take something ill bet they will try fucking with something
If you really want to show off your engine, get an acrylic hood. Although, I don't think such a thing exists for the MKIII, and even if it does I'm not sure if it actually looks good.
Driving hoodless, even if legal, is stupid and just another way to borrow trouble.
Driving hoodless, even if legal, is stupid and just another way to borrow trouble.
there is no law against it here in cali. but its pretty damn stupid if u ask me.
alls u will do is attract unwanted attention.
alls u will do is attract unwanted attention.
Last edited:
RazoE;1159631 said:
Sorry, it seems to me u knew exactly what i ment.
Sorry i had error in my last post.
Commieformia, no hood.
Cop magnet.
2. Taking off hood for no reason?
Idiotic, moronic, Ludacris.
Take your pick.
Cop magnet.
2. Taking off hood for no reason?
Idiotic, moronic, Ludacris.
Take your pick.
Cycoclown;1159674 said:
Im just messing with you..
but as it's been stated before, having no hood on is just asking for shit to fall into the engine bay (bird shit, leaves, PINE NEEDLES) and mess shit up...
there is no need to drive without a hood...
- Status