theWeezL said:
Enforcement is really dependent on where you live, and what agency is pulling you over. I was coming back from the coast not too long ago and got pulled over for doing 73 in a 55. He gave me a warning and said if I keep it around 65-70 I wont get pulled over for speed. He was a County Sheriff, and obvioulsy wasnt worried about speed enforcement. If it had been a State Trooper, I would have gotten a ticket most likely.
As for laws governing safety, they ALL need to be enforced. The problem is its harder to spot a driver thats distracted, (or for that matter just plain incompetent) than it is to spot one speeding or making an unsafe lane change. Im all for enforcement, but I really think the way to cut down on unsafe driving is to have higher standards for licencing. In Arizona my licence was good for 25 years! ....ummm? not everyones driving skill gets better with age! While it would be a pain in the butt, I think mandatory road testing should have to be done every 5 years. But I would also like to see a new class of licence issued for good drivers. To get that class of licence one would have to complete so many hours in a driving simulator as well as performance obstacle course training (something similiar to what the cops have to pass). This new class of licence would allow those that have it to qualify for cheaper insurance, and maybe pay reduced fines for any violation or some other benifits.
anyway, thats just my thoughts on the subject.
Completely agree. I just got my license a few months ago, I've ranted about this before.
I had already learned how to drive long before I got my permit, and drove away from the DMV with it, but the driver's ed (classroom instruction-I did mine online) and the training (6 hrs behind the wheel) were useless. It took me about 2 hrs to complete the online thing, it was almost all common sense. The drivers training was utterly pointless. OK, lets drive around for a couple hours cramed (I'm 6'3) in a Corolla, learn how to parallell park said 4 foot long Corolla, and try not to freak out on the freeway as the Corolla struggles to keep up with te semi's going 55.
Accident avoidance? Nope. Car control? Nope. Car physics and dynamics? Nope. Anything useful? Not unless you didn't know what those things the driver pushes on with his feet were...
They need to have a closed course where you practice recovering from a skid on a wet road, and things suddenly coming at you, and how the weight shifts and throws a car off balance during emergency manuevers.
Funny, I learned balance and car dynamics and physics in Gran Turismo. I was amazed at how close to real life it is. That said, a video game can never substitute for real life training.
Then, getting my license was a JOKE. We drove arond for 20 minutes, and never left a 1/2 mile radius of the DMV. Never went above 35. Never got near the freeway. Never had to park. It was ridiculous. A monkey could've passed.
The test to get your license should involve driving in all conditions, freeway, parking lot, city streets, making sure you can park, etc. Should be a few hours. Believe it or not, you should actually have to be a good driver to get a license. What a concept!
Then, they should road test every so often-maybe 7 years or so. 5 might be a little overkill. And speeding is not the most dangerous thing. Its the distracted drivers this thread is talking about.
/rant