There's a definite balance to the placement of O2 sensors. Too close to the head and you'll burn through them or just get inaccurate readings... many wide band controllers don't provide feed back if the sensor is over heating... If you're tracking per the overheated sensor you could find yourself in BIG trouble.
Another reason to place the O2 sensor further downstream is a more everaged sampling. Anyone else here seen dual wideband kits? They're used so you can keep the O2 sensor decently close (so you don't have to go all the way to the final junction) and to provide a much better view of where the whole engine is as far as fuel mixture is.
With the WB sensor connected to one runner, well, that cylinder could go rich, the ECU leans everything out and five other cylinders get real hot. Not how I'd do it, but I'm sure there are more knowledgeable people who would say it's fine.
Direct bolt on compatibility isn't such a big deal for me... I just don't want to have to start adding more bends to the system. What size is the final collector? ID and OD if you've got them.
Another reason to place the O2 sensor further downstream is a more everaged sampling. Anyone else here seen dual wideband kits? They're used so you can keep the O2 sensor decently close (so you don't have to go all the way to the final junction) and to provide a much better view of where the whole engine is as far as fuel mixture is.
With the WB sensor connected to one runner, well, that cylinder could go rich, the ECU leans everything out and five other cylinders get real hot. Not how I'd do it, but I'm sure there are more knowledgeable people who would say it's fine.
Direct bolt on compatibility isn't such a big deal for me... I just don't want to have to start adding more bends to the system. What size is the final collector? ID and OD if you've got them.