ok...it's almost 2am here right now....................WHY ARE THERE BIRDS SINGING OUTSIDE!?!??!??!?! IT'S F'IN DARK!
Boostaddctn said:i dunno why 87-88 are considered supras, they are celicas to me.
drunk_medic said:I wouldn't go so far as to call 87-88 Supras "Shit Supras". I didn't like the sawblades or the front bumper fascia, or the headlight squirters. The older taillights and 1-piece wing kinda sucked, too, but I DO like the old red rectangular Supra emblem.
They ARE cheaper, and more likely to be picked up by young'ns, but they are still Supras. I hate when young, dumb kids bring discredit on "our crowd", but that's part of any car crowd.
I hate when people let their car go, and it gets thrashed. I may be guilty of this, but at least I won't drive it until the interior is fixed. Heh.
Squid699 said:So the 89's and 90's are the bastard children of the MKIII's.....Rectangular logo, sawblades, but with the newer front bumper and tail lights.....mine is esp odd since it had the 88 wing.....
A MKIII is a MKIII....I don't get why people make a huge distinction....
bullshit90suprat said:87 - 88= rebadged mk2... nuff said...
90suprat said:87 - 88= rebadged mk2... nuff said...