indeed! in the 7m is even worse because of craptacular inefficent VE of the head which are floating around 65% at 6500 RPM from some preliminary data.
See here is some facts based on fluid mechanics and physics
Intake pressure are infact created equal. What distinguishes intake pressure from one motor over the other is the displacement of the engine NOT the turbo. All the turbo does is deliver a set amount of air volume at a given efficency into the motor. To get to 500HP with a petrol/Gasoline AFR of 11.6 takes roughly about 48 lbs/min worth of air WHETHER it is forced induction or Natural Aspirated. This is irrelevant of the engine displacement. What the displacement will effect is the intake plenum pressure, and specifically the relation is as the engine displacement increases, the intake plenum pressure at the same given power DECREASES. So 500hp on a 2.0 4g63 is going to be a heck of a lot higher than a 3.0 7m, which will inturn be higher than a 302. Add to that head inefficeny and it compounds the problem more so.
Any other questions?