i was just wondering if any of you guys had ever used 2 ct-26s to make a tt. also how much power would it make with supporting mods or is it even worth the trouble doing so.
Supraboy89 said:i was just wondering if any of you guys had ever used 2 ct-26s to make a tt. also how much power would it make with supporting mods or is it even worth the trouble doing so.
+3 It's just not worth the time or money. You will make just as much HP and more with a single.dgilman360 said:+ 1
go big single
92nsx said:Im with MKIIINA. Go for it, try it, Plus it would b big time bonus points. I like the way twin turbos look, it spells out power (or looks like power)
MAybe try a small and big turbo set up like the new f-350. (by the way i have fords) but it sounds like it would work. A small turbo to spool up fast at super low RPM and a large one of the higher RPM. ?less turbo lag?:sarcasm:
OneJoeZee said:That's not how sequential setups work.
Twin 57s would spool like shit. If someone was really set on using CT26s(I'd rather use better turbos for a custom TT setup), stock CTs would be sufficient. Able to make ~300hp each.
7Mboost said:Sequential turbos: Some engines use two turbochargers of different sizes. The smaller one spins up to speed very quickly, reducing lag, while the bigger one takes over at higher engine speeds to provide more boost.
And I'm saying if someone somehow came up with enough time, skill, brains, and lots of $ to setup a seqential twin 57 trim setup it would spool great.
Keros said:Moving past the massive lag of trying to spool a CT26 turbo with 1.5L of displacement, and the wildly expensive custom fabrication required... and all the stuff that makes it "infeasable"... I must ask, will they actually fit on the side of the motor in the engine bay?
Thus, the difference between infeasable and impossible.
crisp said:Thank you! Now THAT's some good Canadian Bacon....
-crisp