With that kit, is there anyway you can offer an intercooler with better efficiency than the spearco? that's what I am running now. I guess The question would be though, what do the majority of ppl want.
bluepearl;1190715 said:My Cooleeze pipes:
Lowers fit nice
Uppers fit like crap
1987 thru the fender
Poodles;1191275 said:No offence to LIPP, ETS, or other people that make the piping the way they do, but I think it looks like crap. The HKS setup looks really good as well, and it's because it's not one piece from the fender to the throttle body...
My personal opinion, but I don't like it that way, just wish I could remember the member on the forum that had a custom set that was setup about the same way as the cooleeze but fit better and had proper hold-down brackets for the fender part and the 3000 pipe...
SUPRASTEVE;1197804 said:I like the way how cooleeze has a certain kind of style and character. Lipp lacks that but it has functionality. Is there any place that makes these upper IC pipe cuz I hate the way LIPP looks and cooleeze is crap but looks good.
Rennat;1197926 said:if you want a shit ton of couplers in your piping system do this:
buy the lipp kit
cut in a bunch of random spots
buy a bunch of 2.5'' couplers and t-bolts
put it all together, and now you have the ghetto cooleze kit...
how is the LIPP NOT have "character" and style? the cooleze are welded at funny angles, look like shit, and as from members here, they perform like shit.
SUPRASTEVE;1197941 said:Well everyone has there own opinion. I saw some one state this b4 but you know how the stock upper IC hoses curve and contour with the engine bay. Well why doesn't someone make madrel bent upper ic pipeing that copies the shape of the stock hoses but with the exception of being 2.75 in and having the flange for a BOV.
SUPRASTEVE;1197941 said:Well everyone has there own opinion. I saw some one state this b4 but you know how the stock upper IC hoses curve and contour with the engine bay. Well why doesn't someone make madrel bent upper ic pipeing that copies the shape of the stock hoses but with the exception of being 2.75 in and having the flange for a BOV.
SupraSportJack;1197984 said:I better chime in here.
Our goal with the LIPP kit was the fewest number of couplers with full mandrell bent pipes. One of the reasons why we did not goto 2.75" is it is really tuff to route that. The 2.5" sometimes requires some grinding of the fender well. You have to remember that mandrel bending is different than crush/crimp bending. We can only do so many bends in a given area and make it usable for the masses.
I think alot of the "visual" difference that most see in pics is color. I can charge more and actually get the kits polished or have them painted and you will end up with a better product than all others but the price will be right up there with theres!
Our idea was simple when we designed the kits.
- perform great
- flow better than everything else on the market
- be affordable
- be reproducable
- use excellent quality material
- easy to install
I have probably forgot some of our ideas, but we have been selling them for a few years and so far the feedback has been very good. I have modified the kit to use the Spearco and spearco replica now. As far as I know I do not see any other manufacturers changing there products abilities for the MK3 anymore.
I have my 90 Supra in the shop right now fitting up some new products. Everyone has there own idea of style which is great, when we produce a new part it is from ideas from hundreds of MK3 guys requesting it and us trying to figure a way to do it and do it affordably to our customers.
btw...Cooleeze does not produce any parts anymore as far as I know. We sold his products for MANY years and he is a great guy but I believe he has gone a different direction with his life now.
Jaychen;1198167 said:Does any one know what happened to that Lipp upper pipe that was on suprasport.com? Went from 3000 to the fender and looked similar to cooleze with mounting points on the replacement 3000 piping!
SupraSportJack;1191596 said:The problem is that you have a 2.5" system that only utilizes 2.25"...only as good as the smallest point.
SUPRASTEVE;1197997 said:I...Eliminateing the cruise control because It really doesn't make sense in having it on a stick supra...
Selz202;1198814 said:I have to say, I have owned a few of the kits including:
- Cooleeze
- LIPP/Suprasport
- HKS
And was soon to own the ETS kit until I saw this post up here about it not fitting completely. That and the price hike back to $1000 for the kit.
The LIPP kit was probably the best one i've owned. As Jack said the material is excellent. It isn't going to rust and is actually very thick. If you plan on tapping anything into they are thick enough to get a good amount of threads in there. They're also bead rolled on the ends.
The HKS kit isn't really a good value, so I don't think id ever recommend it.
Cooleeze was alright, it gets the job done but id go with LIPP over it. LIPP has t-bolt clamps where Cooleeze has worm gear.
Tim