Code 51, and TPS question.

Adam M.

New Member
Nov 18, 2009
4
0
0
Mississauga
My sons Supra works crappy and shows code 51.
I read it shows AC problems and TPS problems.
AC was taken off this car, should I still suspect TPS / wiring problem ?
Is TPS from turbo car identical to non turbo car ?
Sorry for perhaps naive questions, but I'm just starting with learning 7M-GTE.
 

lewis15498

Don't blame ebay cheapass
Sep 28, 2008
1,397
1
0
Raynham, Massachusetts, United States
Even with your ac removed code 51 will trip if you the ac button on the climate control is turned on. Judging by its running crappy, I would say its tps related. I'm like 90% sure ge and gte are interchangable, however I think they also changed between years.
 

lewis15498

Don't blame ebay cheapass
Sep 28, 2008
1,397
1
0
Raynham, Massachusetts, United States
All NA supras use the same TPS. Turbos used a different TPS up until march 1989. Turbos manufactured after that date used the same TPS as the NAs. The sticker in your door jamb should tell you when it was made.

Can you use an NA TPS on a pre 89 turbo? I dont know, I'll let someone else chime in here.
 

Me[kk]A

New Member
Nov 16, 2009
44
0
0
Toronto
Hey guys, Im the son with the supra :D
just curious about a few symptoms.

The wierd thing was that prior to us fixing an intake manifold gasket, the car ran better. Once we fixed the vaccuum leak the car ran marginally worse. The car seems very rich, you can def. smell fuel. It does not want to stay on while cold so we have to keep the throttle going. If we let her idle, she glugs down to about 200, then revs from 100-200 a few times then dies.

Once warm the engine still runs rough and the idle still jumps. Would a bad TPS cause all of this or should there be other things i should consider?
 

IwantMKIII

WVU MAEngineering
Jun 12, 2007
2,477
0
0
Perkasie, PA
Welcome to the boards but you need to learn how to use the "search" button. This topic has been well covered 10000000 times.

Your TPS is out of spec for its idle voltage read by the ECU. In other words, it's not properly adjusted to let the ECU know your foot is not on the throttle.
 

IwantMKIII

WVU MAEngineering
Jun 12, 2007
2,477
0
0
Perkasie, PA
3p141592654;1463344 said:
TPS won't cause car to run rich. A hint: code 51 is usually caused by a maladjusted TPS, and that signal tells the ECU to go into idle mode. Your car shows poor idling characteristics, maybe there's a link, do you think? Don't waste your time replacing it, when all it probably needs is an adjustment.

http://www.cygnusx1.net/Supra/Library/TSRM/MK3/manual.aspx?S=FI&P=101


You may want to rethink that statement.
 

lewis15498

Don't blame ebay cheapass
Sep 28, 2008
1,397
1
0
Raynham, Massachusetts, United States
3p141592654;1463344 said:
TPS won't cause car to run rich.
IwantMKIII;1463347 said:
You may want to rethink that statement.
3p141592654;1463617 said:
Oh really?

Really. TPS resistance decreases with throttle increase. When TPS wears out the resistance of it decreases. Because of this your computer thinks its getting more throttle than it really is aka rich condition.
 
Oct 11, 2005
3,816
16
38
Thousand Oaks, CA
AKA no such thing. I have disassembled the ECU code. Your car computes fuel primarily from the AFM and RPM. Everything else is a correction. TPS is used only for transient throttle events. Don't believe me, disconnect the VTA signal wire and go for a drive. You will not run rich, you won't even know its disconnected because it will drive normal. Most of these cars no longer even have a good VTA signal due to flatspots worn in the TPS potentiometer trace.
 

IwantMKIII

WVU MAEngineering
Jun 12, 2007
2,477
0
0
Perkasie, PA
3p141592654;1463700 said:
AKA no such thing. I have disassembled the ECU code. Your car computes fuel primarily from the AFM and RPM. Everything else is a correction. TPS is used only for transient throttle events. Don't believe me, disconnect the VTA signal wire and go for a drive. You will not run rich, you won't even know its disconnected because it will drive normal. Most of these cars no longer even have a good VTA signal due to flatspots worn in the TPS potentiometer trace.

Im well aware of the fact a TPS can be disconnected and the car can be driven. It would be a poor design if it didn't. Try resetting your ECU and disconnecting the TPS.....maybe then my point will be made. Try resetting your ECU and adjusting your TPS out of spec (as this is mostly what happens when TPS's go bad), find out how great it runs.
 

Me[kk]A

New Member
Nov 16, 2009
44
0
0
Toronto
So we confirmed last night that the TPS is shot. We also still have a leak on the intake manifold side still so i'll be tackling the injector O-rings next.

Thanks for all the assistance thus far!
 
Oct 11, 2005
3,816
16
38
Thousand Oaks, CA
Like I said, its not used for anything but transient fuel calcs. The ECU does not check that the TPS signal is valid, and resetting it will not make any difference. There are no error codes for the TPS except for the IDL signal, which is the only signal from the TPS that will actually make a significant difference to driveability. Please stop posting your armchair theories.
 

jetjock

creepy-ass cracka
Jul 11, 2005
9,439
0
0
Redacted per Title 18 USC Section 798
Well, there's code 41 Jon. It can be set by three situations, all of which involve VTA. That said as long as the load and rpm signals "jive" you're correct in there won't be permanent enrichment. In other situations there will be. For example if VTA is maxed at idle CO will rise to around 6%.

The "ECU resetting" thing needs to die though. It's pretty clear the majority here don't understand what it's about...
 

Me[kk]A

New Member
Nov 16, 2009
44
0
0
Toronto
Im completely new to Supras. Im used to hondas. Im learning about this car as I go along and its been a mess of a process. It seems she ran better with more issues than currently as ive fixed them.

my biggest concern currently is the idle which i pray another TPS with the adjustment done correctly will help.

Im also fixing the oil return line to the turbo, replacing the current wastegate as it is not holding pressure and going to be running another wiring harness to clear out the mess that is currently half the problem.

I remember reading that the supra used to have an issue with cold starts and running badly which an ecu change fixed. Is this a common issue for the 86-88 (yellow plugs) ecu? would an upgrade to an 89+ harness and ecu solve this?

my mileage is also horrible lately.. under 300 kms for a full tank of 94 octane fuel.. hoping finally fixing the vaccuum leak, wastegate, tps will help in this area.
 
Oct 11, 2005
3,816
16
38
Thousand Oaks, CA
Damn, Gary's keeping me honest. I forgot about 41, fair point, and the WOT open-loop trigger will impact mixture, but driveability will still be good. I doubt he has a 4-gas analyzer! :icon_bigg

Anyway, back on topic he doesn't have a code 41, so its moot. 51 needs to be fixed first, so adjust the TPS.
 

Me[kk]A

New Member
Nov 16, 2009
44
0
0
Toronto
3p141592654;1464341 said:
Damn, Gary's keeping me honest. I forgot about 41, fair point, and the WOT open-loop trigger will impact mixture, but driveability will still be good. I doubt he has a 4-gas analyzer! :icon_bigg

Anyway, back on topic he doesn't have a code 41, so its moot. 51 needs to be fixed first, so adjust the TPS.

pickin up the tps tomorrow, along with all new injector o-rings and grommets for the intake manifold. pray for me gents.