heres his profile if anyone wants to have a look http://www.supraforums.com.au/forum/member.php?u=7946
apparently he has the quickest NA JZA80 supra down the 1/4 mile.
apparently he has the quickest NA JZA80 supra down the 1/4 mile.
Apparently we are all centrelink dole bludgers who cant afford the "supra" name
- Thread starter MA70R
- Start date
- Status
14.171 is the record holder for a N/A lol kind of Sad........... I thought it would be quicker then that
Turbo Habanero;1463664 said:
That's not too shabby, a bone stock 2010 SS Camaro only does 13.6 @ 108 mph. With 20 year newer technology and twice the cubic inches.
Supracentral;1463669 said:
Its not slow thats not what i was saying just thought the record holder would be faster.. But i guess 3600lbs N/A 2J.......
ANd those camaro's well idk i raced one in my 87T from 30 roll with me (165lbs) and my friend (300lbs) and i fell to his door by 80 and started to catch back up by 105ish we were neck and neck.
MA70R;1463625 said:
in Australia only.
Took him months to even find a video of the run, and there is no timeslip to prove it anyways.
Turbo Habanero;1463680 said:
NA mkiv's are about 3200-3300 lbs, they do not weigh as much as mk3's.
NA - http://www.edmunds.com/used/1995/toyota/supra/4316/specs.html
turbo - http://www.edmunds.com/used/1995/toyota/supra/4317/specs.html
yea lol who gives a fuck what this douch reckons. I and all of you guys know our mk 3's would prob whoop his skylines butt. He is better off with his r34 anyway (skyline.... the car to buy when you have questions about your sexuality)
Mastapip;1463271 said:
They're not as bad as you think. You've got to own one to appreciate it.
I've owned a '92 GTS-T (RB20), a '91 GT-R (RB26) and my current one is a '90 GT-R.
The only problem I've ever had between the three was my first GT-R had electrical gremlins, the gauges would lose all power sometimes when going over rough bumps (someone hack jobbed the stereo prior to me)
My current GT-R is having it's motor pulled come spring but that's because I want to replace all the seals, gaskets, piston rings, etc...
dobester87;1464474 said:
I hate to say it, and I don't want to start a pissing match BUT...
I'm afraid that the stock GT-R is a faster and better car than the stock MK3.
AWD, .1 more displacement, HICAS, Independant Throttle Bodies, and overall better construction.
I've pitted my JZA70 (Stock) against my GT-R (when it was stock) to a WOT 1/2 drag & and a circuit. The GT-R outperformed the JZA70 on both...
Like I said, I don't mean to cause a pissing match (remember, I do own both cars) but I'm just saying, that a GT-R can easily whoop an MK3 (especially one with a 7M)
its all in the eye of the beholder i guess... some people like to go spend 50k on a car for bragging rights... some people like to buy old school performance cars and build them up for half the price...
i personally have fallen in love with mid 80's early 90's sports cars... foreign or domestic... they all have their place...
the supra... of any year basically... is a high end car of its time... what was sticker price back in the day for a new MKIII? I believe mine was in the high 20's for an atx non turbo targa....
-AcId-
i personally have fallen in love with mid 80's early 90's sports cars... foreign or domestic... they all have their place...
the supra... of any year basically... is a high end car of its time... what was sticker price back in the day for a new MKIII? I believe mine was in the high 20's for an atx non turbo targa....
-AcId-
Turbo-A was the fastest production car in Japan....until the new model GTR came out.
Stock for stock, sure, the GTR is gonna win. With the same budgets for car and mods, the 7M will bring the pain though.
Stock for stock, sure, the GTR is gonna win. With the same budgets for car and mods, the 7M will bring the pain though.
I haven't seen a properly built 7M take a built GT-R so I'm pessomistic until I can see both go at it.
With that being said,
I tend to stay off SF unless I'm shopping for parts or I want a good laugh.
There's far too much misinformation and just general bullshit going around over there. I find that SM has alot more members that are willing to help out someone in need and answer questions without flaming the asker into a pile of ash.
There's a few members (who I wont bring up) on SF whos goals are to troll and spread bullshit among the forums. Then bitch when they're told that they're wrong.
With that being said,
I tend to stay off SF unless I'm shopping for parts or I want a good laugh.
There's far too much misinformation and just general bullshit going around over there. I find that SM has alot more members that are willing to help out someone in need and answer questions without flaming the asker into a pile of ash.
There's a few members (who I wont bring up) on SF whos goals are to troll and spread bullshit among the forums. Then bitch when they're told that they're wrong.
tissimo;1463008 said:
Apparently you don't go further than these two subforums here. Look in the Subject Matter folders. SF wishes it had half the information that we have here
and on that note. A thread complaining about another forum.......
- Status