stomis;1541132 said:I only asked if anyone HAS done it. Not if it can be done. I know it can be done.
And no I dont have the resources to do it myself. Theres 2 good reputable driveshaft shops in my area.
88 Blue_Dragon;1541141 said:it's probably not going to be cheaper if you have to buy a driveshaft anyways and then have a shop do all the work on it. if your trying to go cheap on a driveshaft and your whole molding idea in your other post then a supra is probably not the right car for you... try more like a ford escort....
gennro;1541316 said:I'm pretty sure Stomis by the time it is all said and done you will end up spending the same amount of money at a shop as you would just to buy one already made. Wouldn't you think everyone would have one made locally if it was cheaper and yielded the same product? For one you wouldn't be able to use any parts from the supra drive shaft. So everything for the new drive shaft would have to be sourced from somewhere.
So the bottom line is if you can source all the parts for a decent price go ahead. Its no different then any of these pre-made drive shafts that any of these places make as long as the shop doing it knows what they are doing. In my honest opinion just run the stock drive shaft until it goes out cause most likely the stock carrier bearing will go out eventually and that costs more then half a new single piece drive shaft would cost.
gennro;1541345 said:If I remember correctly the stock U-joints can't really be replaced on the stock drive shaft without some sort of modification done to them.
Poodles;1541461 said:LS1 f-body = under 3.0 gear ratio (something like a 2.93 or a 2.73 IIRC)
NA MKIII Supra = 4.10 gear ratio
They both have around the same size wheels. On a 4x4 truck the wheels are much larger which will lower driveshaft speeds. There was a reason Toyota used a 2 piece driveshaft on these cars and it's NOT just for smoothness.
Poodles;1541497 said:I was a bit hard on you as well, but a driveshaft failure is NOT what you want to happen at 100MPH+
Also, for a road course, you're not going to have lag on a stock turbo if you have all the normal upgrades, but you will be underpowered with an NA... Not knocking you, just stating a fact, there was a reason the 7M MKIII's came turbo only in Japan.
IJ.;1541581 said:200hp Na probably isn't going to get the car anywhere near the driveshaft critical speed the danger here is if some of the young guys going NA-t think this is a good idea then go out and do a few top end runs on their one piece shaft with 4.30's....
Someone posted a critical speed calculator awhile back it would be an idea to punch your numbers into it and see how close to the edge you'll be.
I built my 2 piece back when I ran 4.30/4.10's and was running it to 8500 so one piece wasn't even close to an option for me.
koldfire08;1541679 said:What you saying is that a well done 2 piece would be better then a solid 1 piece?
Think i might have got confused.
VooDoo;1541147 said:unless you have never had to work on it. In that case better check to see if its a real supra.
stomis;1541282 said:And btw what do you mean "Check to see if its a real supra"? How do you clone a supra? Its not like the MK3 was a package on a base car and the trim could be bought and added.