Or nitrous. Hell If you had a stock CT on a ls7, you still wouldn't hit those numbers. Pics wont do anything. I could get a million pictures of stock 7ms too.
9.5 psi stock ct26 dyno sheet
- Thread starter flyjum
- Start date
I dont know why everyone is freaking out. Every dyno is different and also a dyno is merely a tool used for tuning. Take it to the track and see what it does. 343 rwhp and 360rwtq in a full weight mkiii should be mid-low 8 sec 1/8th mile.
I do a 8.3 sec 1/8th mile with 300whp.. 350whp should be faster than that... Thats a full weight Auto targa supra.. Heaviest of them all.. Full interior including rear and spare.
my buddies car here did 310 and 325
spec stock motor with mileage
3 inc exhaust down pipe to match
i mucked around with the afm
I shimmed waste gate
I made nice set of custom hard ic pipes
bumped timing to 14
bosh bov
cone filter
stock ecu and everything els was stock
spec stock motor with mileage
3 inc exhaust down pipe to match
i mucked around with the afm
I shimmed waste gate
I made nice set of custom hard ic pipes
bumped timing to 14
bosh bov
cone filter
stock ecu and everything els was stock
9.5 psi measured at the manifold is about 13 from the CT-26. (edit: the intercooler drops pressure) A stock 7MGTE Supra Turbo will vary some from engine to engine, and dyno to dyno with weather. Stock is as low as 170 rwhp, and as high as 190 hp. I read somebody's did just over 200 stock. It might with good weather, a healthy engine, and the high end of boost (4.8-7.5 stock actuator).
My 3910lb ride with half a tank of gas and me in it went 98 in the quarter at 13 psi and full exhaust no tuning, Lex meter to get around fuel cut. That is about 10 mph faster than a stock A340E. The numbers don't add up.
My 3910lb ride with half a tank of gas and me in it went 98 in the quarter at 13 psi and full exhaust no tuning, Lex meter to get around fuel cut. That is about 10 mph faster than a stock A340E. The numbers don't add up.
Last edited:
See I think the answer here lies with Toyota.
When they released the car and said 60lbs torque for the head bolts and 230hp for the engine, they actually meant torque the head bolts to 90lbs and the car is actually 330hp+.
This thread is lols.
When they released the car and said 60lbs torque for the head bolts and 230hp for the engine, they actually meant torque the head bolts to 90lbs and the car is actually 330hp+.
This thread is lols.
SupraCorwin;1722183 said:
Sarcasm aside, this is another point. HKS and TRD claimed 330 bhp from the CT-26 at 13 psi with FCD and enrichment with exhaust. I think not. Definetly not on a dyno, an not on the engine. HKS later went to 285 at 11.5 psi(or something like that) with the staging system. That is more plausable than 330.
Considering my CT2657 at 17 psi makes 342 rwhp and 372 rwtq I find this number extremely hard to believe. I also have forged pistons, in 4th gear the car is into boost before 1500 rpm and at 9 lbs before 2500 so I am still doubting these numbers from an all stock CT26.
I'll just say this. I made 353whp and 386 ftlbs on a 50 trim ct-26 with meth and tuning and no afm and open dp. These numbers are too high. I would go ahead and tune on this dyno and then go to another after tuning. I think you will find a lower number. however if you insist these numbers are true and you really think the stock ct-26 can put down 400whp why on earht would anyone ever swap a 2jz into the mk3?
I'll make 400 ft lbs of torque on a stock ct26 boost only.. I made 352 rwtq, and 303 whp on stock ct and 11 lbs with 91.. NIt that hard to do
the car has 850's and e85 with lots of timing maybe thats why it made good power at low boost the numbers are real just call xact dyno and ask tim
oh so now the fact that is has lots of timing and E85.. Then I believe it completely, thats what im on
lol its good shit. i turned the boost up to 15psi no inercooler piping blows off now thank god!! so i think i could be right around 400whp or so i just dont have the money for dyno time right now. my girl and i just had a baby girl so busy with all that. i did go to the track friday night tho 13.2 at 114mph on street tires i was going to post but i am tired of people saying no you didnt lol i just need to take video!
To be honest that is an ok number...DynaPacks are known to read higher than dynojets and mustangs, where mustangs read the lowest. Also since it's a load bearing dyno, a lot of factors can be off to get the correct correction factor. For example (not saying the mustang is the same as a dynapack) one can change the correction factor on the mustang or drastically change the weight of the vehicle or HP@50 to get stupid numbers out of a car. From here on though, you should stick with that dyno so you know if you have any gains or losses. i use eddy current (load bearing) dynos to tune and dynojets for numbers that can be compared with other vehicles.