Am I weird for liking the -89 wing better than the 3 piece 89+ wing? Cuz I'm totally switching in a couple weeks
(wings that is)
(wings that is)
Sam;1909012 said:It's personal preference I suppose. Call me crazy, but I would like the +89 3 piece, but about a foot taller. It would look "sick" as the kids say these days.
supraguy@aol;1909083 said:The Kaminari wing was the perfect middle ground between stock and the Greddy/Gracer.
I like it man, looks good.Flateric;1909193 said:I prefer 3 piece, with a twist myself! :naughty:
yhatzee89;1909010 said:Am I weird for liking the -89 wing better than the 3 piece 89+ wing? Cuz I'm totally switching in a couple weeks
(wings that is)
#04;1909270 said:what were you planning on doing with the 6 extra left over holes in quarter panels....?
Orion ZyGarian;1909214 said:Pre89 wing actually reduces drag, 89+ adds. Its .02 coefficient of drag, but every little bit helps! I tend to think the 89+ fits better, but I've had both and I'm not sure I would give it up yet. Debating on figuring out the fitment of the 2010+ Mustang pedistal spoiler. Love the look.
Flateric;1909193 said:I prefer 3 piece, with a twist myself! :naughty:
View attachment 64354View attachment 64355View attachment 64356View attachment 64357View attachment 64358
Poodles;1909577 said:spoiler vs wing with actual downforce
Orion ZyGarian;1909914 said:Gas mileage...every little bit helps!
AbsoluteSpeed;1909120 said:I'd love to see a small ducktail wing for our cars. I think it would look perfect.