Chambers;1818421 said:I think its to wide for the MKIII chassis anyway, the 1UZ-FE barely fits and the 2UR-FSE looks bigger/wider.
Dylan JZ;1818415 said:Orido's putting one in an 86
The engine's cylinder heads are made from a magnesium alloy, while like the 1UR engine block it is die-cast to save weight
te72;1818535 said:
Kai;1818437 said:Three problems exist:
1) Hard to find
2) Expensive
3) Wiring/Management Nightmare
So...no. Stick with a 1UZ/3UZ if you want a V8 Mk3.
A. Jay;1810296 said:What's this noise I'm hearing lately about putting extra effort into something JUST to make it different?
What other people have is not a factor in what pleases me.
A. Jay;1822660 said:1) I was just pointing out that if you have the goal of "V8 mk3" there are more than two options
2) There are countless ways to personalise a LSx swap
3) I'm not into people's JZ swaps, swapping a 3-L 550-pound engine for a 3-L 550-pound engine, but I know they did it because it was a cheap/easy way to acheive the results that they wanted and it made them happy
4) I'm not gonna suggest Ford because they're either iron-block or DOHC
and 5)
I know this isn't about brand-loyalty, since the Toyota that built the Supra isn't the same Toyota that built the 2UR-FSE. Btw if I had that kind of money I'd swap an all-aluminium BMW M3 I-6. Just letting you know I'm not an LS-nut.
Dylan JZ;1822663 said:(...)None of the latter was a personal jab at you though, I just felt the need to speak my mind after reading the latest replies. Apologies if it came off differently.
Dylan JZ;1822663 said:(...) I agree on the BMW thing, I've been saying Toyota should make a 3.5L aluminum block I6 as a follow up to the 2JZ