tturnpaw said:
This is how misinformation is allowed to keep circulating on the internetz. Reserve judgment about information you find that isn't supported by a reasonable source of evidence.
2jz question...
- Thread starter supra8903
- Start date
This is how misinformation is allowed to keep circulating on the internetz. Reserve judgment about information you find that isn't supported by a reasonable source of evidence.
I take anything Simann says with a grain of salt. He is the same tool that was calling alot of us stupid because he "knew" the 1JZ and 2JZ cranks were identical. I wouldn't consider him a credible source on anything.
It's really kind of destressing that he's found himself another forum to spread his seeds of bullshit on.
It's really kind of destressing that he's found himself another forum to spread his seeds of bullshit on.
Last edited:
Of course, thats what everyone says. I wish i woulda instead of im proud of what i did. I also couldnt find the one post where someone said the 1j head was superior in design. but oh well i dont care anymore.
The Reaper said:
honestly, i dont have to prove anything. I wouldnt be here for that, i would be on another forum. Ive lost interest in this whole arguement, i was only mentioning an option in swaps.
OneJoeZee said:
your mother didnt hold you enough did she onejoezee? lol Considering my knowledge ive learned in the past 3 months over this forum i think more people need to do less bit**ing and have a little more consideration for someone whos sitting here with an open mind ready to learn. Noone is going to spend countless hours searching everything, so dont let your post number speak for itself. All you had to say was no it doesnt, and after you can read my post i basically said ok. But after i provided proof people were talking about flow capabilities, you took it over the line. I shouldnt have to take the fall for their actions, nor spend 3 hours searching up a specific thread over something im not interested in. I think before anyone says anything, throw both heads on a flow bench since its just a big arguement anyway.
tturnpaw said:
They already did that. The 2JZ head flowed better... What are we trying to prove here?
tturnpaw said:
Seeking out information is pretty fundamental regardless if it takes you 3 minutes or 3 hours. Just look at this post recommending that someone should flow bench the heads. It's been done and that info can be found fairly easily. I know because I referred to it and it's only a few pages back in this section.
Let's not bring my mother into this.
Don't get so offended by my posts. Take it with a grain of salt. I'm just one person. You don't have to believe me on anything. Draw your own conclusions from the information you have available to you.
I only take it as someone trying to offend me or my intelligence. and im done trying to prove anything. I guess im all out wrong. Ill admit it.
There is a thread on SF if I could find it, with charts from a 1j and 2j head flow and the 2j was better flowing, anyone remember the thread?
he just said that. Hopefully im not the only person who has learned a lesson. Makes me feel better about the 2j
high psi 1jz said: