Search results

they're only going up in value though ;) (maybe...)

pics? do luck? is that an mk4 with a stupid body kit?

18 college 1986.5 n/a and i really want to upgrade/trade to a turbo.. but i love my car all the same. oh and i'm down for cali!!

part it out if u got time. it been hit but the rest is fine....

cool well i picked it up for 20 dollars, so here's what i have (its all i have) now i need; wiring harness connector (i have bare wires, no clips) stereo mounts a few cables to run to/from the dash to the amp under my passenger seat.

thanks!!! bye!

stock metal HG? is that how they can hold so much HP without many internal mods?

nobody? man...sorry about the short notice. i think it will work...but i'm really new to car amps. i guess 20 isnt a bad price either way. if it was newer i would just nab it...but its about 4 or 5 years old. the high price they sold for on ebay was 39 ish.

I have a stock head unit from a 1992 camry, double din, and it has no integrated amp....so i let it sit. i just found a kenwood KAC-746 for 20 dollars, its a 4 channel. but i wanted to make sure the headunit i have would give a good enough signal for this setup to work. i'm planning to run the...

yikes:3d_frown:

what is fender rolling? i've always assumed its something to do with bending the lip of the fender outward a bit, but its been hard for me to really notice it since i still dont truly know what it is... can somone post a before and after fender rolled car? preferably a supra.... is it hard...

that car looks nutty...does he plan to put those body panels back in? it looks kinda...naked. or like a POS grinning hackjob. but it is just a pic. but yeah...that thing looks kinda mean with all that turbo equiptment sticking out....

and aston martin. shit and lotus. its a runt. but who cares its damn fast and i'm sure 200ft/lbs right from 0 RPM would be pretty fun!!

don't forget TVR... check the tail lights :) by performance i'm talking the car they compared it too... not it in itself. and i posted this in part because it was a performance car. so yeah, my point is, i was referring to the other car

yeah!! and...sounds practical! they mentioned it's cheaper to run than another gas-powered car, but i'm not sure if its a performance car, i cant remember and i didnt know what it was when i read it...but its in the article...

yeah i have fun with my ge... i guess its the fact its the fastest car i've driven as to why i dont understand why people say its slow...

take a look, its fascinating... i like the 10min charge = 250 mile range bit! http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/06/12/lightning-car-co-to-use-altairnano-batteries-in-new-sports-car/ (oh, and the 0-60 in under 4 sec is nice too:naughty: ) .

ah, cool.

ahh, yeah its too bad the supra didn't do better, it would be cool to own a car that was a good rally contender... but i guess even 3rd place is pretty good, depending on who the competitors are. speaking of that...who WAS up against the supra in those races? or rather, what type of car...

stock psi at 10.5? soo...a simple cam swap can add 80 horses? dang... so does this have any negative effects on gas mileage or something? i mean...why not just give the engine those cams in the first place.....