hey i have been looking for the 86.5 1/4 times, and the '89 + Supra turbo 1/4 times does anyone have the correct information thank you.
Last edited:
Supra n/a, and Turbo 1/4 mile tiems STOCK*
- Thread starter 92TealSupra
- Start date
All the ones that I'm aware of:
(First number is 0-60.....second is 1/4 mile ET)
1983 Toyota Supra 8.9 16.8
1984 Toyota Supra 8.7 16.8
1986 Toyota Supra 7.0 15.4
1988 Toyota Supra 7.9 16.0
1989 Toyota Supra Turbo 6.6 15.2
1991 Toyota Supra Turbo 7.1 15.6
1993 Toyota Supra Turbo 4.6 13.1 (C&D Mar '93)
1994 Toyota Supra 6.9 15.2
1994 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.3 13.7
1995 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.5
1997 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.6
However, I do recall reading somewhere that I believe a 1988 Supra Turbo *AUTO* ET'd 14.7 in completely stock form.
(I'd believe it, I did a 13.76 with basically just an exhaust)
Hope that helps,
Jeff
(First number is 0-60.....second is 1/4 mile ET)
1983 Toyota Supra 8.9 16.8
1984 Toyota Supra 8.7 16.8
1986 Toyota Supra 7.0 15.4
1988 Toyota Supra 7.9 16.0
1989 Toyota Supra Turbo 6.6 15.2
1991 Toyota Supra Turbo 7.1 15.6
1993 Toyota Supra Turbo 4.6 13.1 (C&D Mar '93)
1994 Toyota Supra 6.9 15.2
1994 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.3 13.7
1995 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.5
1997 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.6
However, I do recall reading somewhere that I believe a 1988 Supra Turbo *AUTO* ET'd 14.7 in completely stock form.
(I'd believe it, I did a 13.76 with basically just an exhaust)
Hope that helps,
Jeff
My old stock 91 turbo went 15.2 @ 91 stock with a 2.2 60'
my 92 goes 15.7 @ 88mph, but its turbo is chipped up, so not the best shape. Plus its an auto
my 92 goes 15.7 @ 88mph, but its turbo is chipped up, so not the best shape. Plus its an auto
wow an 86.5 NA is slightly faster then a '91 Turbo. I'm proud to own an 86.5 NA now, lol.
any clue why?
any clue why?
Possibly it was a bare bones hardtop vs a loaded targa turbo with the added weight from the bracing and other luxuries. More likely that it was an 86 mk2 though and not an 86.5 mk3 though.
Zer0DeGreeZ;1268149 said:
Very strange...Did all years have a specific rear end ratio?? or did some years use several different rear end ratios?
the newer the heaver on mk3's. hp vs weight. plus its only a 30 hp difference between the n/a and turbo stock from toyota.
cmdeoro;1268683 said:
I doubt thats the case. the times for the 86 listing are to closely in range of the other mkIII's. if you look at the ones before 86 they are all a lot slower. to me that signifies a different car (in this case body and engine)
Zer0?