Zazzn - If that guy is like some I see around here, the PermaCool is better because he's using one
I bet he's not running a thermostat to the cooler either...bad move if I'm correct. Send me the link to the thread...I'd like some amusement today.
The stacked plate coolers (like B&M) are superior IMO...better thermal transfer due to the internal oil channel area afforded by the plates and much more resistant to damage (think rocks) that will easily bend the fins on a the tube/fine type like PermaCool. And, PermaCool products are cheap for a reason
There's no way using an oil cooler is going to cause an engine to develop rod knock, seize, etc due to oil pressure loss. Like I said, I would run the biggest oil cooler I can fit...use a thermostat to control the temps/flow to the cooler. For most applications a 180 deg stat is what you want...for road course work a 160 will keep the oil temps down. What you are looking for are oil temps in the 88-100 deg C range. I like the Mocal thermostats.
The problem with the stock cooler design is it is in the rad/coolant circuit. That is going to limit the thermal transfer from the oil to the coolant due to the circuit's primary function of keeping the motor cool. Your PWR radiator is going to increase overall system capacity and that will help keep oil temps down. The problem is if coolant temps go over 100 deg C...the effect on oil viscosity is not linear...oil thins pretty quickly as it gets hot. The air-to-oil coolers do not have this problem and, with a thermostat, keeps the oil temp at where it needs to be. Also, because it's on a different circuit it will help the radiator to remove heat produced by the engine.
One advantage of the stock system is it will get the oil up to ops temp quickly...that is exactly what you want...the motor is designed to run with oil viscosity at 100 deg C. At temps below that, any oil is thicker (especially in cold climates) and does not flow as well. This is the purpose of running a thermostat per the above discussion. If the stock system had it's own coolant circuit (small rad and pump) it would be very efficient...it's the stock system coolant temps that cut efficiency.
The decision to remove the stock system is your Zazzn. Does it work well...yes, it does (much better than a 7M), but that is on a car designed for the street from the factory without any mods (higher HP).
tlo86 - it looks like the 2JZ-GTE motor has an oil cooler and the 2JZ-GE does not. I'm betting there's an oil filter stud similar to the 7M-GE motor that screws into the block...this would allow the use of a 2 port adapter plate that would eliminate the stock oil cooler and allow routing to a remote filter head. You'll have to look at the EPC.