factory sway bars thicker in different years/models?

[rwdanthony]

okay, it has come to my attention that my 87 n/a sport package supra has a 21mm rear sway bar. However, on energy suspension's database, they have listed 23mm as the rear for 86.5-92.

does 89+ have a 23mm rear sway bar? or turbo models? or do any of the models have a factory 23mm rear sway bar?

I would like to know because i'm talking to one of the people who work there, and this has caused an error in my order. were trying to figure out which is wrong. my car, or the database...

and if this is true, then this could possibly be an upgrade for those who have a 21mm rear sway bar who's experiencing understeer.

 

[NashMan]

in 91 they change the front sway bar from hallow to solid and the springs got littel bit more stiffer, most likly used the hopped up 1jz gt /R or what ever they call it. I not sure how much stiffer they are just know that they are.


yet they still retained the stuiped plastic rear end links (slaps head)

 

[rwdanthony]

in 91 they change the front sway bar from hallow to solid and the springs got littel bit more stiffer, most likly used the hopped up 1jz gt /R or what ever they call it. I not sure how much stiffer they are just know that they are.


yet they still retained the stuiped plastic rear end links (slaps head)

ahh okay but so far no changes in the dimensions. do you have any knowledge about the rear sway bar?

its weird how also some sway bar end links are plastic while some are metal. mine are metal.

 

[NashMan]

ahh okay but so far no changes in the dimensions. do you have any knowledge about the rear sway bar?

its weird how also some sway bar end links are plastic while some are metal. mine are metal.

it never changed

I only found this out when swapping my sway bars off my 92 for set of st's and notice my 92 was alot stiffer then my buddies 89 in spring wise and did not under steer as bad

and notice that the front bar was alot heavery then the 89 bar

then found out it was soild in stead of hallow