dual walbro fuel pumps??

boost fiend

Banned
Jul 24, 2005
852
0
0
Rockford, Il
so im thinking aboout going this way in a while, im just wundering if anyone here has done it and what i might need to do it other than the 2nd fp.
 

boost fiend

Banned
Jul 24, 2005
852
0
0
Rockford, Il
id like to see the pics please. as far as power im at about 399.xx now. used to be a little more but i sold my boost controler to save my hg till i put another one on in a month or so with the new turbo. im aiming for about 500hp.
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
boost fiend said:
id like to see the pics please. as far as power im at about 399.xx now. used to be a little more but i sold my boost controler to save my hg till i put another one on in a month or so with the new turbo. im aiming for about 500hp.

ok

i guess i will quote myself then

figgie said:
well

math should answer that question :)

255 lph = 4250 cc per minute.. this is at what ever the rated flow of 255 lph is at.

4250 cc per minute max

so we take that number and calculate
(4250cc/min / 10.5 ) / .5 BSFC hp = 809hp MAX at 255 lph. Now keep in mind that if i recall, the 255 lph is a ZERO psi (ie free flow). That number drops with higher PRESSURE.


ninjaedit: thanks the Grand National guys :)

http://www.gnttype.org/techarea/fuel...Graphsmall.jpg

so with this new information

200 lph @ 45 psi = 3333.33 cc/min

(3333.33cc/min / 10.5 ) / .5 BSFC hp = 634.92 hp.. keep in mind this is CRANK power at 45 PSI now

so one will still be more than adequate.
 

gixxer750

2jzget comingsoon!
Mar 30, 2005
2,333
0
0
Mississippi
well, 500 whp puts him at close to 600 crank power. What if one walbro isn't operateing at PEAK effiency..... it wouldn't be a bad idea to have two at that power level for a safety margin. Also....if the power plans change, say you want 50 more hp...... well, then you would need two walbros, so why not?