do supras need premium gas???

chefma70

New Member
Mar 19, 2008
404
0
0
Florida
cause i read in several places they do. if the car requires premium i think il pass my really good condition mkiii to someone else soon and buy a motorcycle.latley i have been using the medium octain ?90??is this safe for the engine?

anyone in here use regular in their n/a and notice a difference from using premium.rodknock??
 

chefma70

New Member
Mar 19, 2008
404
0
0
Florida
cool i think i stick with 89 for a year or 2 then decide if i wanna keep her.i hate gas prices so much. DUCATI 848 ftw(sf)<<
 

jetjock

creepy-ass cracka
Jul 11, 2005
9,439
0
0
Redacted per Title 18 USC Section 798
^ Your two cents adds up at the pump ;)

Assuming the engine is stock you should run what the manual says. All more octane does is allow the knock control system to push the timing a bit. If you want that extra bit of performance go ahead and cough up for it. Otherwise it's a complete waste of money.

Fwiw I've run 87 in my turbo (what the book calls out) for 95&#37; of it's life (21 years) without issue.
 

cartel1_950

supra is gone
Jan 30, 2006
498
0
0
calgary
running 90 octane here in my turbo caused pinging and when i switched to 91 it stopped. my car was a bit of princess though so that might have had something to do with it
 

Supratrbox2

Damnit
Jul 27, 2005
133
0
0
South Jerzey
Most stations around me have stopped selling premium and plus is next. But I still buy 93+. The only time I ran less than 93 is when the dot head pumped in regular after I told him 3 times premium and my car ran like shit afterwards.
I also have a 1jz so maybe its more used to higher octanes.
 

jessetooslow

New Member
May 11, 2007
551
0
0
42
Tiverton, R.I.
I was running 93, never felt a difference, went to 87 or whatever the cheaper is and it seems to be more peppy with no pinging, I go to the good stations, not the small guys.
 

mirage83

Member
Mar 21, 2008
457
0
16
Georgia
Maybe a foolish question, maybe not, but for a newly rebuilt engine should I just stick with 87 octane, or would there be any benefit to the unbroken-in engine if I went to a higher octane for a few thousand miles? Just curious since I'm about to be in that situation and since we're on the subject of gas thought I would ask.
 

j3pz

still learning
mirage83;1057326 said:
Maybe a foolish question, maybe not, but for a newly rebuilt engine should I just stick with 87 octane, or would there be any benefit to the unbroken-in engine if I went to a higher octane for a few thousand miles? Just curious since I'm about to be in that situation and since we're on the subject of gas thought I would ask.

i dont think its a foolish question at all. from what people have said in this thread, running 87 shouldnt be a problem, but for only a few dollars more you can add a little bit of insurance to your build.
 

CRE

7M-GE + MAFT Pro + T = :D
Oct 24, 2005
3,485
0
0
Denver, CO
85 (R+M/2) + 17.5&#186;BTDC = :D

I am in Denver, so altitude is how I get away with 85. I don't imagine I'd need anything higher than 87 (worst case scenario 89) to keep things running strong without issues at lower altitudes though.
 

dumbo

Supramania Contributor
Jul 16, 2008
1,911
0
0
Albera, Too Far North
octane level is resistance to burn, higher compression=more heat=pre ignition EDIT(detonation, my bad, pre-igntion is hot spots i think a whole different problem) if octance rating is not high enough

has very little to do with preformance, or saftey(unless you need it) bout 9.5:1 prolly should be using 92oct. and 10:1 proll abouve 92oct. correct me if i'm wrong.

and having aluminum heads dissipates heat faster, can get away with lower octance
 
Last edited: