diffent home for fuel injectors?

NashMan

WTF did he just wright ?
Aug 5, 2005
4,940
17
38
43
Victoria BC
Well, I have bean looking into this for some time, but my knowledge can only go so far.

Here is the idea: I was talking with a buddy and I know he's pretty dang smart. He was looking at the stock head, and I mentioned something I was thinking about for some time.

Moving the fuel injectors out of the head and putting them in the intake manifold flange to give better mix.

After a bunch of humming and thinking he gave me an answer.

He stated the 7m seems not to mix well, give poor performance and less flow.


What do you guys think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jdub

Official SM Expert: Motor Oil, Lubricants & Fil
SM Expert
Feb 10, 2006
10,730
1
38
Valley of the Sun
Doesn't "mix" well? The same head (with mods) that has produced over 1000 HP and has no problem making 500 HP? What makes you think this is "poor porformance"?

I think your buddy is FoS.
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
tsk tsk tsk.....

Mix well it does. Homogeneous mix is the word you are looking for along with proper atomization.

the 7m head does indeed not flow as efficently as a 2jz and definetly no where near the 4G63 head. That is a head design issue and no amount of porting will fix that.
 

jdub

Official SM Expert: Motor Oil, Lubricants & Fil
SM Expert
Feb 10, 2006
10,730
1
38
Valley of the Sun
Flow is a different issue...it may not flow as well as later Toyota head designs, but porting, over size valves, and a matched cam will improve it. Moving injector placement to improve air/fuel charge ratio will produce little to no gain...the stock ECU (or an aftermarket EMS) uses injector duration to accomplish that.

The spray pattern of the injectors is the biggest factor and the head chamber design determines flame front progression/efficiency. To say the head will affect air/fuel charge ratio is barking up the wrong tree.
 

landspeedrich

New Member
Nov 5, 2008
24
0
0
Chicagoland
figgie;1217824 said:
tsk tsk tsk.....

Mix well it does. Homogeneous mix is the word you are looking for along with proper atomization.

the 7m head does indeed not flow as efficently as a 2jz and definetly no where near the 4G63 head. That is a head design issue and no amount of porting will fix that.

I agree with figgie,this is a design issue.But hey,aren't we looking for HP here?Not MPG!In my opinion,I want that fuel injected right at the back sides of the intake valves,as close as possible.Gasoline does'nt like to hang around in the air.Let the 15 to 25 lbs. of boost and that shiny forged piston suck all that mixture into the cylinder,and atomize it before reaching TDC.Then BAM!Thats whats its all about...right?My 2 cents RS
 

NashMan

WTF did he just wright ?
Aug 5, 2005
4,940
17
38
43
Victoria BC
i highly dought he a fool since he teaches fuild dynmicks and such

he did not wip out any pads of paper or calculate any cetp in his head

this is what he said if you move them back a bit and 9orted and re shaped the ports and flange and filled in the old spot were the injectors used t be it whould do a better job

all in all just wounder if any one has thought of this

i heard of it befor on some race car go figure i forget what one all i know is it was a rally car



jdub;1217811 said:
Doesn't "mix" well? The same head (with mods) that has produced over 1000 HP and has no problem making 500 HP? What makes you think this is "poor porformance"?

I think your buddy is FoS.
 

NashMan

WTF did he just wright ?
Aug 5, 2005
4,940
17
38
43
Victoria BC
it chould mabey if you reshaped every thing


basicly i foud my answer it's alot of work chould be good chould be bad in the end resalt

Poodles;1218322 said:
Injectors are aimed into the ports, putting them at the flange wouldn't do that...