9/11: Press for Truth

JustAnotherVictim

Supramania Contributor
Well since I know you don't have access to the oval office I wouldn't call anything crap.
Pretty much all the info presented is backed up with sources. Of course when information is not released to you some parts can only be speculation.

Cliffs: Shows how much runaround the facts the White House gave people after 9/11.
 

91T breezen'

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012
Apr 4, 2005
1,149
0
0
NOYFB!
You guy's and your stupid ass conspiracy theories! It's almost like you want them to be true. Would that make you feel better about your latent anti-Americanism? Give it a rest already. While your looking for an enemy within, the real enemy, is plotting your demise.:evil2:
 

Facime

Leather work expert
Jun 1, 2006
2,716
0
0
60
Corvallis OR
I watched the whole thing and here is the conclusion I came to...its all true, but it doesnt prove anything. My impression the whole way through is that it doesnt point to any kind of coverup, rather it points to what Ive known about the Bush administration all along, its complete incompetence!

I watch GW talk at press conferences and he reminds me a little boy. You know the kind of kid who who used to act like he knew it all, but was totally clueless? And when faced with or confronted by their own bullshit, they squirm like a kitten in a burlap bag.

The only part of that film that I found interesting and possible evidence of anything beyond incompetence, was the Afgan airlift to Pakistan. I know why it was done, but if Al-Quida was in those planes, then it is just sickening.


All in all I think it was a well done film and brought up some great points. I personally dont think the filmakers were actually trying to "prove" there was a conspiracy to coverup corruption. I think they were really just putting out the facts as they saw them, and hoping people would make up their own minds. I already made up my mind...there was no conspiracy and the white house didnt know about the 9/11 plans ahead of time...BUT, they should have, and it certainly proves their lack of leadership at the least and their total incompetence at the most.
 

JustAnotherVictim

Supramania Contributor
Yes Weezl, too many are looking at it as trying to say this is absolute proof. It leaves the conclusions up to you basically. All that's really being said is we would like some answers for things that have been avoided time and time again.
Yes 91T, wanting to know the truth is Anti-Americanism :wtf: you go ahead and blindly follow anyone that's put into office and continue believing they have your best interests at heart. Well while we're at it why don't we imprison anyone who questions the government. That work for you?
I didn't post the video to debate what happened, it was just so people could see it and draw their own conclusions.

What happened at Tora Bora Rakk? In a condensed version please. :)
 

rakkasan

Currahee!!
Mar 31, 2005
2,997
0
36
55
Fort Campbell, KY
JustAnotherVictim said:
What happened at Tora Bora Rakk? In a condensed version please. :)

There were no "escape routes" left open. They escaped because the artillery couldn't reach inside the two valleys they left through. The mortors were out of range.

Here are two pics somewhat explaining what happened. The route they escaped by is in the second picture
 

rakkasan

Currahee!!
Mar 31, 2005
2,997
0
36
55
Fort Campbell, KY
JustAnotherVictim said:
I see. Why wasn't there anyone posted in that area? Was it to avoid the mortar fire?
I'm just curious because there's a group on each end and then one on the opposite side but nobody is where you have the path they escaped on.

The ridge line is the Afganistan / Pakistan border. There *should* have been Packistani troops ready to intercept the AQ troops, but it's been speculated that the commanders of said troops were bought off by Bin Laden....

To say that escape routes were left open is just plain horse shit.
 

JustAnotherVictim

Supramania Contributor
rakkasan said:
The ridge line is the Afganistan / Pakistan border. There *should* have been Packistani troops ready to intercept the AQ troops, but it's been speculated that the commanders of said troops were bought off by Bin Laden....

To say that escape routes were left open is just plain horse shit.

From what you say it was the fault of Pakistan. The way they said it did imply that it was the fault US.

Thanks for clearing that up for me. :)